Abstract
Textbooks as a prominent product of educational content’s didactical transformation are usually published as a series. Textbooks are often accompanied by workbooks and teacher’s books. These publications are designed to support teacher’s work and can have a significant impact on the teaching practice. To deepen the understanding of chemical education at lower-secondary schools, the goal was to map chemistry teachers’ use of workbooks and teacher’s books. An electronic questionnaire containing close-ended questions as well as scales was used for this purpose. Information about workbooks and teacher’s books’ use, frequency of use, perceived importance and purpose were gathered. Whereas 63% of the 387 respondents reported using workbooks they consider important for the quality of education, teacher’s books are only used by 24% of teachers, with only 4% reporting their frequent use. The results indicate that workbooks are mostly used during chemistry lessons or for student homework, however a significant share of teachers mentioned using them for lesson preparation. The absence of a teacher’s book, coupled with the teachers’ reluctance to use them even when available, also pointed to their approach to teaching preparation based on the search for educational content and specific activities rather than methodological support in a broader sense.
References
- Bakken, A. S. (2019). Questions of autonomy in English teachers’ discursive practices. Educational Research, 61(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1561202 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Bayindir, N. (2010). The perception and use conditions of teachers about the activities in teachers’ books in terms of curriculum. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(9), 4173–4177. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2010/4173-4177.pdf Search in Google Scholar
- Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
- Červenková, I. (2010). Žák a učebnice: užívání učebnic na 2. stupni základních škol [Student and a textbook: Textbooks’ use on a lower-secondary level]. Ostravská univerzita, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar
- Erol, H. (2017). An evaluation on functionality of the workbook for social studies for the 7th graders. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi=Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.001 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Fadilla, I., & Usmeldi. (2020). Preliminary study for development of teacher’s Books oriented researchbased learning on science lesson in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012068 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Fiala, V., & Honskusová, L. (2020). The inquiry diary: Students’ motivation towards water-quality evaluation. In M. Rusek, M. Tothova, & K. Vojir (Eds.), Project-Based Education and Other Activating Strategies in Science Education XVII (pp. 37–45). Charles University, Faculty of Education. WOS:000567209500004 Search in Google Scholar
- Fleisch, B., Taylor, N., Herholdt, R., & Sapire, I. (2011). Evaluation of back to basics mathematics workbooks: A randomised control trial of the primary mathematics research project 1. South African Journal of Education, 31(4), 488–504. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v31n4a466 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Fürnkranz, J., & Kliegr, T. (2015). A brief overview of rule learning. In International Symposium on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web. RuleML 2015 (pp. 54–69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21542-6 4 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Güven, S. (2010). Evaluation of life sciences teachers’ books according to teachers’ opinions. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1914–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.1009 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Hahsler, M., Grün, B., & Hornik, K. (2005). Arules – A computational environment for mining association rules and frequent item sets. Journal of Statistical Software, 14(15), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i15 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Heinonen, J. (2005). Opetussuunnitelmat vai oppimateriaalit: peruskoulunopettajien käsityksiä opetussuunnitelmien ja oppimateriaalien merkityksestä opetuksessa [Curricula or educational materials. Elementary school teachers’ conceptions of curriculum and teaching materials for educational purposes]. University of Helsinki, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences. Search in Google Scholar
- Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T., Shearer, C., & Wirth, R. (2000). CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-by-step data mining guide. SPSS. https://the-modeling-agency.com/crisp-dm.pdf Search in Google Scholar
- Janoušková, S., Žák, V., & Rusek, M. (2019). Koncept přírodovědné gramotnosti v České republice – analýza a porovnání. Studia paedagogica, 24(3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2019-3-4 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Johansson, M. (2006). Teaching mathematics with textbooks: a classroom and curricular perspective [Doctoral thesis, Lule˚a tekniska universitet]. Search in Google Scholar
- Kendedes, T.A., & Ratnawulan, R. (2020). Validity of integrated science teacher’s book on junior high school based on character with the theme of cohesion and adhesion on living with shared model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012128 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Laws, K., & Horsley, M. (1992). Education equity? Textbooks in New South Wales government and non government secondary schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 12(3), 7–15. Search in Google Scholar
- Lepik, M., Grevholm, B., & Viholainen, A. (2015). Using textbooks in the mathematics classroom – the teachers’ view Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3–4), 129–156. Search in Google Scholar
- Li, L. (2013). The complexity of language teachers’ beliefs and practice: One EFL teacher’s theories. The Language Learning Journal, 41(2), 175–191. Search in Google Scholar
- MŠMT. (2018a). Statistická ročenka školství – výkonové ukazatele. http://toiler.uiv.cz/rocenka/rocenka.asp Search in Google Scholar
- MŠMT. (2018b). Výběr z adresáře škol a školských zařízení. http://stistko.uiv.cz/registr/vybskolrn.asp Search in Google Scholar
- Mullis, I.V., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timss.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/T11 IR Mathematics FullBook.pdf Search in Google Scholar
- Nainggolan, B., Hutabarat, W., Situmorang, M., & Sitorus, M. (2020). Developing innovative chemistry laboratory workbook integrated with project-based learning and character-based chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 895-908. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13359a Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Nulty, D.D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. Search in Google Scholar
- Orafi, S.M. S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37(2), 243–253. Search in Google Scholar
- Perkkilä, P. (2002). Opettajien matematiikkauskomukset ja matematiikan oppikirjan merkitys alkuopetuksessa [Teachers’ mathematical beliefs and the role of the mathematics textbook in primary education]. Jyväskylän yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-5338-6 Search in Google Scholar
- Rusek, M., Stárková, D., Metelková, I., & Beneš, P. (2016). Hodnocení obtížnosti textu učebnic chemie pro základní školy. Chemické listy, 110(12), 953–958. http://chemicke-listy.cz/docs/full/2016 12 953-958.pdf Search in Google Scholar
- Rusek, M., & Vojíř, K. (2019). Analysis of text difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00141C Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Rusek, M., Vojíř, K., & Šubová, Š. (2020). Lower-secondary school chemistry textbooks’ didactic equipment. Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology, 25(1–2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/cdem-2020-0004 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Sikorová, Z. (2005). Transforming curriculum as teacher’s activity. In M. Horsley, S.V. Knudsen, & S. Selander (Eds.), Has Past Passed? Textbooks and Educational Media for the 21st Century (pp. 256–261). Stockholm Institute of Education Press. Search in Google Scholar
- Sikorová, Z. (2010). Učitel a učebnice: užívání učebnic na 2. stupni základních škol [A teacher and textbooks: The use of textbooks at lower-secondary education]. Ostravská univerzita, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar
- Steenbrugge, H.V., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2013). Teachers’ views of mathematics textbook series in Flanders: Does it (not) matter which mathematics textbook series schools choose? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 322–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.713995 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Suhandi, A., & Samsudin, A. (2019). Effectiveness of the use of developed teacher’s book in guiding the implementation of physics teaching that provides science literacy and instill spiritual attitudes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052054 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019a). Používání učebnic chemie na základních školách v České republice: tvorba a pilotní ověření dotazníku. In M. Rusek & K. Vojíř (Eds.), Project-based Education and Other Activating Strategies in Science Education XVI. (pp. 179–192). Charles University, Faculty of Education. WOS:000482135600022 Search in Google Scholar
- Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019b). Science education textbook research trends: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2020). Vývoj kurikula chemie pro základní vzdělávání v České republice po roce 1989 [Development of chemistry curriculum for lower-secondary education in Czechia after 1989]. Chemické listy, 114(5), 366–369. http://www.chemicke-listy.cz/ojs3/index.php/chemicke-listy/article/view/3606/3552 Search in Google Scholar
- Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2021). Preferred chemistry curriculum perspective: Teachers’ perception of lower-secondary school textbooks. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), in press. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.316 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- Vojíř, S., Zeman, V., Kuchař, J., & Klieger, T. (2018). EasyMiner.eu: Web framework for interpretable machine learning based on rules and frequent itemsets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 150, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.006 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Downloads
2
- Of teachers and textbooks: lower secondary teachers' perceived importance and use of chemistry textbook componentshttps://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00083K
- End-of-Chapter Questions in Lower Secondary Science Textbooks from Kosovo: What Can We Learn and Do Next Based on the PISA 2018 Framework?https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2026.2722020
1