Potenciál využití online médií ve výuce geologie na základní a střední škole

Tereza Jedličková; Vasilis Teodoridis; Denisa Bartůňková

doi:10.14712/18047106.3219

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Scientia in educatione Research Reports

Potenciál využití online médií ve výuce geologie na základní a střední škole

Tereza Jedličková, Vasilis, Denisa,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.3219

PDF (Czech)

How to Cite

Jedličková, T., Vasilis, & Denisa. (2024). Potenciál využití online médií ve výuce geologie na základní a střední škole. Scientia in Educatione, 15(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.3219

Download Citation

Abstract

The presented study has mapped the media representation of selected geological terms related to the educational topic of "Evolution of Organisms on Earth" and has analyzed their educational potential for lower and higher secondary school levels. The content analysis of 114 online articles from the top fifteen most-read media websites, derived from the Anopress database, has focused on the context of usage, the level of explanation of geological terms, and the usability of online articles for teaching. The results have shown that 69 % of the analyzed articles have not explained the selected geological terms according to their definitions, and 71 % of the articles cannot be used to teach the studied subject. They also indicate that commonly available online media content often provides pupils with a superficial understanding of geological terms and topics and cannot be used to form their preconceptions, rather it tends to generate misconceptions. The style and presentation of information in the media do not correspond to the needs of classroom practice.

Keywords geology terms media education lower and upper secondary school content analysis Anopress

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

[1] Arnseth, H. Ch., Erstad, O., Juhaňák, L., & Zounek, J. (2016). Pedagogika a nové výzvy výzkumu ICT: role digitálních technologií v každodenním životě a učení mládeže. Studia paedagogica, 21(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2016-1-5 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[2] Asberger, J., Thomm, E., & Bauer, J. (2021). On predictors of misconceptions about educational topics: A case of topic specificity. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0259878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259878 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bartůňková, D. (2022). Mediální obraz vybraných geologických pojmů z tematického celku Historický vývoj organismů na Zemi. [Bakalářská práce, Univerzita Karlova]. https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/177037 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 5(11), 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110507 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[6] Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. (2017). Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors. CBE — Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[7] Činčera, J. (2007). Práce s hrou pro profesionály. Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[8] DeJaeghere, J., Morrow, V., Richardson, D., Schowengerdt, B., Hinton, R., & Mu˜noz Boudet, A. (2020). Guidance note on qualitative research in education: Considerations for best practice. Building Evidence in Education. https://www.youthpower.org/resources/be2s-guidance-note-qualitative-research-education-considerations-best-practice Search in Google Scholar

[9] Doulík, P., & Škoda, J. (2001). Metoda učení jako aktivní konstrukce poznatků žáka aplikovaná ve výuce chemie. Biologie, chemie, zeměpis, 3, 125–130. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ferguson, D. G., Abele, J., Palmer, S., Willis, J., McDonald, C., Messer, Ch., Lindberg, J., Heath Ogden, T., Bailey, E. G., & Jensen, J. L. (2022). Popular media and the bombardment of evolution misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 15(19). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-022-00179-x Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[11] García, F. C., García, A., Berdén, A., Pichardo, M., & Justicia, F. (2014). The effects of question-generation training on metacognitive knowledge, self regulation and learning approaches in Science. Psicothema, 26(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.252 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[12] Holec, J. (2014). Problematika geologického vzdělávání na základních školách a gymnáziích. Metodický portál RVP.cz. https://clanky.rvp.cz/clanek/18299/PROBLEMATIKA-GEOLOGICKEHO-VZDELAVANI-NA-ZAKLADNICH-SKOLACH-A-GYMNAZIICH.htm Search in Google Scholar

[13] Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight. Young children and their internet use. EU Kids Online. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/52630/1/Zero to eight.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[14] Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., & Gemo, M., (2018). Young children (0–8) and digital technology – A qualitative study across Europe. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2760/294383 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[15] Janoušková, S., Teplý, P., Fatka, D., Teplá, M., Cajthaml, T., & Hák, T. (2020). Microplastics – how and what do university students know about the emerging environmental sustainability issue? Sustainability, 12(21), 9220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219220 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[16] Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying new literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.314 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kolář, Z. (2012). Výkladový slovník z pedagogiky: 583 vybraných hesel. Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kontríková, V., Černíková, M., & Šmahel, D. (2015). Byl jednou jeden tablet: děti (0–8) a digitální technologie. Masarykova univerzita. https://webcentrum.muni.cz/media/3081365/0-8 national report final cz.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[19] Krykorková, H., & Chvál, M. (2001). Rozvoj metakognice – cesta k hodnotnějšímu poznání. Pedagogika, LI(2), 185–196. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Lacina, M. J. (2020). Historický vývoj Země a organismů na Zemi v učebnicích pro základní a střední školy. [Bakalářská práce, Univerzita Karlova]. https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/122038 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). The influences of information literacy, internet addiction and parenting styles on internet risks. New Media Society, 14(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410406 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[22] Loh, C. E., & Sun, B. (2022). The impact of technology use on adolescents’ leisure reading preferences. Literacy, 56(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12282 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[23] Male, H., Angelianawati, L., & Sudirman, A. (2021). A study of students online reading habits and preferences. Degres, 20(1), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1877/degres.v20i1.57 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[24] Matsa, K. E., Silver, L., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2018). Western Europeans under 30 view news media less positively, rely more on digital platforms than older adults. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2018/10/30/western-europeans-under-30-view-news-media-less-positively-rely-more-on-digital-platforms-than-older-adults/ Search in Google Scholar

[25] Mašek, J. (2010). Mediální didaktika: Významná subdisciplína české mediální pedagogiky? In J. Mašek, Z. Sloboda & V. Zikmundová (Eds.), Mediální pedagogika v teorii a praxi (s. 74–79). FPE ZČU. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Mediaguru. (2021). Návštěvnost zpravodajských webů je zatím vyšší než loni. https://www.mediaguru.cz/clanky/2021/10/navstevnost-zpravodajskych-webu-je-zatim-vyssi-nez-loni/ Search in Google Scholar

[27] Mintzes, J. J. (2020). From constructivism to active learning in college science. In J. J. Mintzes & E. M. Walter (Eds.), Active learning in college science (pp. 3–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4 1 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[28] Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2005). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

[29] MŠMT (2021). RVP ZV – Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. https://www.edu.cz/rvp-ramcove-vzdelavaci-programy/ramcovy-vzdelavacici-program-pro-zakladni-vzdelavani-rvp-zv/ Search in Google Scholar

[30] MŠMT (2022). RVP G – Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. https://www.edu.cz/rvp-ramcove-vzdelavaci-programy/ramcove-vzdelavaci-programy-pro-gymnazia-rvp-g/ Search in Google Scholar

[31] Nezvalová, D. (2006). Konstruktivismus a jeho aplikace v integrovaném pojetí přírodovědného vzdělání. Univerzita Palackého Olomouc. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Osvaldová, B., & Halada, J. (2007). Praktická encyklopedie žurnalistiky a marketingové komunikace. Libri. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Prins, F. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2006). The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: New support for the threshold of problematicity theory. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.008 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[34] Rabušicová, M. (2002). Gramotnost: staré téma v novém pohledu. Masarykova univerzita & Nakladatelství Georgetown. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Radváková, V. (2015). Práce s textem na střední škole. Orbis scholae, 9(3), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2016.6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[36] Richardson, J. T. E. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001053 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[37] Russ-Mohl, S., & Bakičová, H. (2005). Žurnalistika: komplexní průvodce. Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Skalková, J. (2007). Obecná didaktika. Grada Search in Google Scholar

[39] Sloboda, Z. (2010). Mediální výchova v rodině z pohledu české společnosti: dílčí výsledky z výzkumu. In J. Mašek, Z. Sloboda & V. Zikmundová (Eds.), Mediální pedagogika v teorii a praxi (s. 27–36). FPE ZČU. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Smejkalová, K. (2014). K pojetí konstruktivismu jakožto modernímu paradigmatu vzdělávání. Paideia: Philosophical E-Journal of Charles University. 11(1), 1–11. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Smith, J. P., Disessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302 1 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[42] Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Personality and Intelligence (pp. 169–187). Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[43] Šeďová, K. (2004). Média jako pedagogické téma. Pedagogika, 1(2004), 19–33. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Škoda, J., & Doulík, P. (2011). Psychodidaktika. Metody efektivního a smysluplného učení a vyučování. Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Šlapáková, B. (2012). Proměny mediální reprezentace ekologické agendy v českém tisku. [Diplomová práce. Masarykova univerzita]. https://is.muni.cz/th/yr2ym/DP SLAPAKOVA FINAL.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[46] Švaříček, R., & Šeďová, K. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Trampota, T. (2006). Zpravodajství. Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Vágnerová, P., Benediktová, L., & Kout, J. (2018). Kritická místa ve výuce přírodopisu na základní škole. Arnica, (8)1, 56–62. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Van Riper, A. B. (2003). What the public thinks it knows about science. EMBO Reports, 4(12), 1104–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400040 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[50] Vaughn, R. (2018). Preparing preservice K–8 teachers for the public school: improving evolution attitudes, misconceptions, and legal confusion. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17 047 02 7 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[51] Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[52] Vlčková, K. (2011). Smíšený výzkum: Jedná se o nové a závažné téma? In T. Janík, P. Knecht & S. Šebestová (Eds.), Smíšený design v pedagogickém výzkumu: Sborník příspěvků z 19. výroční konference České asociace pedagogického výzkumu (s. 1–6). Masarykova univerzita. https://doi.org/10.5817/PdF.P210-CAPV-2012-84 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[53] Westerstahl, J., & Johansson, F. (1994). Foreign news: News values and ideologies. European Journal of Communication, 9(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323194009001004 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Potenciál využití online médií ve výuce geologie na základní a střední škole

How to Cite

Abstract

References

Downloads

License