Tablet alebo notebook? Komparatívna štúdia žiakovho vnímania rozdielnych technologických prístupov v počítačom podporovanom chemickom laboratóriu

Marek Skoršepa; Jarmila Kmeťová; Erika Horváthová

doi:10.14712/18047106.1322

Vol 11 No 1 (2020): sciED Výzkumné stati

Tablet alebo notebook? Komparatívna štúdia žiakovho vnímania rozdielnych technologických prístupov v počítačom podporovanom chemickom laboratóriu

Marek Skoršepa, Jarmila Kmeťová, Erika Horváthová,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1322

PDF

Jak citovat

Skoršepa, M., Kmeťová, J., & Horváthová, E. (2020). Tablet alebo notebook? Komparatívna štúdia žiakovho vnímania rozdielnych technologických prístupov v počítačom podporovanom chemickom laboratóriu. Scientia in educatione, 11(1), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1322

Stánhout citace

Abstrakt

Školské experimentovanie s podporou výpočtovej techniky je v relevantnej literatúre už niekoľko desiatok rokov prezentované ako jeden zo sľubných prístupov v štúdiu prírodných vied. Technológie však podliehajú veľmi častým a rýchlym zmenám, a preto aj v oblasti počítačovej podpory laboratórnej činnosti žiakov možno za posledné obdobie sledovať rôzne technologické riešenia. V tomto príspevku sa zaoberáme komparáciou žiackeho vnímania experimentovania s dvomi rozdielnymi koncovými zariadeniami: (i) notebookmi a (ii) tabletmi, ako súčastí rovnakého typu meracieho systému. Pre účely štúdie sme vytvorili sadu štyroch počítačom podporovaných aktivít z chémie, ktoré boli realizované dvomi skupinami žiakov slovenských gymnázií. Kým prvá skupina pracovala s meracími systémami, kde boli ako koncové zariadenia použité notebooky, druhá skupina pracovala na rovnakých aktivitách s tabletmi. Cieľom štúdie je zistiť, či rozdielne technologické prístupy majú potenciál generovať štatisticky významné rozdiely vo vnímaní tohto typu experimentovania samotnými žiakmi.

Reference

Ambrose, B. S. (2004). Investigating student understanding in intermediate mechanics: Identifying the need for a tutorial approach to instruction. American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1648684 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Aksela, M.K. (2005). Supporting meaningful chemistry learning and higher-order thinking through computer-assisted inquiry: A design research approach [Dizertačná práca]. University of Helsinki. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Aksela, M.K. (2011). Engaging students for meaningful chemistry learning through microcomputer-based laboratory (MBL) inquiry. Educació Química EduQ, 9, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2003.02.66 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
ASELL – Advancing science by enhancing learning in the laboratory website. (2014). http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/asell/asell.site/ Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Atar, H.Y. (2002). Chemistry students’ challenges in using MBL’s in science laboratories. In P.A. Rubba, J.A. Rye, W. J. DiBiase, & B.A. Crawford (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp. 2–23). Charlotte, Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Barton, R. (1997). How do computers affect graphical interpretation? School Science Review, 79(287), 55–60. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Beichner, R. J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270809 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Bernhard, J. (2003). Physics learning and microcomputer based laboratory (MBL) learning – effects of using MBL as a technological and as a cognitive tool. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science Education Research in the Knowledge-Based Society (pp. 323–331). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Bílek, M., Kričfaluši, D., Budweiserová, K., & Danielová, M. (2002). Digitální váhy a počítač ve výuce chemie. In M. Bílek (Ed.), Profil učitele chemie II.: Sborník příspěvků z jednání v sekcích XI. mezinárodní konference o výuce chemie (s. 206–209). Gaudeamus. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Borghi, L., De Ambrosis, A., Lunati, E., & Mascheretti, P. (2001). In-service teacher education: An attempt to link reflection on physics subjects with teaching practice. Physics Education, 36(4), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/36/4/303 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Brasell, H. (1987a). Effectiveness of a microcomputer-based laboratory in learning distance and velocity graphs [Dizertačná práca]. University of Florida. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Brasell, H. (1987b). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240409 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Buntine, M.A., Read, J.R., Barrie, S. C., Bucat, R.B., Crisp, G.T., George, A.V., Jamie, I.M., & Kable, S.H. (2007). Advancing chemistry by enhancing learning in the laboratory (ACELL): A model for providing professional and personal development and facilitating improved student laboratory learning outcomes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90033J Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Chen, G., Chang, C., & Wang, C. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers & Education, 50(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Čtrnáctová, H., Čížková, V., Hlavová, L., & Řezníčková, D. (2012). Dovednosti žáků v badatelsky orientované výuce chemie. In J. Reguli (Ed.), Zborník z medzinárodnej konferencie „Aktuálne trendy vo vyučovaní prírodných vied (Smolenice 2012) (s. 31–36). Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Euler, M., & Müller, A. (1999). Physics learning and the computer: A review, with a taste of meta-analysis. In M. Komorek, H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, & A. Kross (Eds.), Second International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (pp. 1–3). Kiel, European Science Education Research Association. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th edition. SAGE Publications. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Fu, Q., & Hwang, Q. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Gašparík, V. (2014) Školské počítačové meracie systémy vo vyučovaní chémie na základnej škole. Biológia, ekológia, chémia, 18(4), 48–53. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
George, A.V., Read, J.R., Barrie, S. C., Bucat, R.B., Buntine, M.A., Crisp, G.T., Jamie, I. M., & Kable, S.H. (2009). What makes a good laboratory learning exercise? Student feedback from the ACELL project. In M. Gupta-Bhowon, S. Jhaumeer-Laulloo, H. Li Kam Wah, & P. Ramasami (Eds.), Chemistry Education in the ICT Age (pp. 363–376). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9732-4 34 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Gilbert, J.K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Haksiz, M. (2014). Investigation of tablet computer use in special education teachers’ courses. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1392–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.240 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Hedlington, L., White, H., & Curtis, S. (2019). “I cannot live without my [tablet]”: Children’s experiences of using tablet technology within the home. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.043 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Held, Ľ., Žoldošová, K., Orolínová, M., Juricová, I., & Kotuľáková, K. (2011). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania (IBSE v slovenskom kontexte). Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90027H Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Horváthová, E. (2018). Počítačom podporované experimenty s dotykovými koncovými zariadeniami [Diplomová práca]. FPV UMB. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Ješková, Z. (2004) Počítačom podporované experimenty z termiky a termodynamiky v prostredí IP COACH. Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Johnstone, A.H. (2010). You can’t get there from here! Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800026d Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. (2004). Education & technology. An encyclopedia. ABC Clio. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Lavonen, J., Aksela, M., Juuti, K., & Meisalo, V. (2003). Designing user-friendly datalogging for chemical education through factor analysis of teacher evaluations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1471–1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072755 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. (2011). Science learning and instruction. Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Routledge. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Routledge. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Linn, M. C., Layman, J.W., & Nachmias, R. (1987). Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(87)80029-2 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Linn, M. C., & Songer, N.B. (1991). Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 885–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660281003 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Liu, Ch., Wu, Ch., Wong, W., Lien, Y., & Chao, T. (2017). Scientific modeling with mobile devices in high school physics labs. Computers & Education, 105, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Mamlok-Naaman, R., Eilks, I., Bodner, G., & Hofstein, A. (2018). Professional development of chemistry teacher. Theory and practice. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Mang, C., Brown, N., & Piper, L. (2017). “Old school” meets “new school”: Using books and tablets to improve information literacy and promote integrative learning among business students. The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.07.003 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D.R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Marcum-Dietrich, N. I., & Ford, D. J. (2002). The Place for the computer is in the laboratory: An investigation of the effect of computer probeware on student learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(4), 361–379. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Metcalf, S. J., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Probeware and handhelds in elementary and middle school science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019637.22473.02 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Mokros, J.R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children’s ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240408 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Courtois, C., Schellens, T., & Marez, L. (2014). A qualitative study about the implementation of tablet computers in secondary education: The teachers’ role in this process. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1192 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Nachmias, R., & Linn, M. (1987). Evaluations of science laboratory data: The role of computer-presented information. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240509 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Oliemat, E., Ihmeideh, F., & Alkhawaldeh, M. (2018). The use of touch-screen tablets in early childhood: Children’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards tablet technology. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.028 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Pierri, E., Karatrantou, A., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2008). Exploring the phenomenon of change of phase of pure substances using the microcomputer-based-laboratory (MBL) system. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1039/B812412B Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Priest, S. J., Pyke, S.M., & Williamson, N.M. (2014). Student perceptions of chemistry experiments with different technological interfaces: A comparative study. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1787–1795. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400835h Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Rane, L. (2013). The effectiveness of MBL experiments in developing conceptual understanding in kinematics among undergraduate physics students. In T. Bastiaens, & G. Marks (Eds.), World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Las Vegas) (pp. 2495–2502). San Diego, USA, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Redish, E. F., Saul, J.M., & Steinberg, R.N. (1997). On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 65(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18498 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.019 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight. Children’s media use in America. Report of Common sense media’s program for the study of children and media. Common Sence Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/file/zerotoeightfinal2011pdf-0/download Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Rogers, L.T. (1995). Computer as an aid for exploring graphs. School Science Review, 76(276), 31–39. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. 2nd ed. CA. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Russell, D.W., Lucas, K.B., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). The role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in kinematics. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10129 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Sassi, E., Monroy, G., & Testa, I. (2005). Teacher training about real-time approaches: Research-based guidelines and training materials. Science Education, 89(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20041 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Schauer, F., Lustig, F., Dvořák, J., & Ožvoldová, M. (2008). An easy-to-build remote laboratory with data transfer using the Internet School Experimental System. European Journal of Physics, 29(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/29/4/010 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2013). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. UNESCO working paper series on mobile learning. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219637 Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Simsek, M., & Dogru, I.A. (2014). Tablet Pc based clasroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4246–4249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.925 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Skoršepa, M. (2012). Ako „uhasiť pálenie záhy – príklad školského chemického experimentu s podporou výpočtovej techniky. Biológia, ekológia, chémia, 16(3–4), 8–11. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Skoršepa, M. (2014). Stomach acid and antacids. Project No. 517587-LLP-1-2011-1-ES-COMENIUS-CMP. [online] http://comblab.uab.cat/ Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Skoršepa, M. (2015). Počítačom podporované experimenty v prírodovednom vzdelávaní. Belianum (Vydavateľstvo UMB). Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Skoršepa, M., & Melicherčík, M. (2001). Zaujímavé kontinuálne merania z chémie uskutočňované SM Systémom. In Proceedings of II. Conference for Ph.D. students (pp. 254–258). Nitra, FPV UKF. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Skoršepa, M., Stratilová Urválková, E., Šmejkal, P., Tortosa Moreno, M., & Urban-Woldron, H. (2014). Activities with sensors in laboratory of biology: Students’ motivation and understanding the results. In M. Nodzy´nska„ P. Cie´sla, & A. Kania (Eds.), Experiments in teaching and learning natural sciences (pp. 25–33). Pedagogical University of Krakow. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Skoršepa, M., & Šmejkal, P. (2018). Comprehending Computer Based Laboratory Activities by Slovak and Czech Students. In P. Ciesla, & A. Michniewska (Eds.), Science Teaching in the XXI Century (pp. 72–82). Pedagogical University of Krakow. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Skoršepa, M., & Tortosa Moreno, M. (2014). Faktory ovplyvňujúce motivačnú orientáciu žiakov v počítačom podporovanom laboratóriu. Acta Universitatis Matthiae Belii, ser. chem., 15, 84–91. SPSS INC. PASW Statistics for Windows. (2009). Ver. 18.0. SPSS Inc., Ed. 2009. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Stein, J. S. (1987). The computer as lab partner: Classroom experience gleaned from one year of Microcomputer-Based Laboratory use. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 15(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.2190/12PK-CDVR-EGP4-XDLW Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Svec, M. (1999). Improving graphing intrepretation skills and understanding of motion using microcomputer based laboratories. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Šmejkal, P., & Stratilová Urválková, E. (2011). Školní měřicí systémy pro výuku chemie – mají o ně žáci vůbec zájem? In M. Ulrich, & K. Zatloukal (Eds.), Alternativní metody výuky 2011, 9. ročník mezinárodní konference (s. 1–9). Gaudeamus. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Šmejkal, P., & Stratilová Urválková, E. (2012). Support for use of probeware in science for teachers and pupils. In P. Ciesla et al. (Eds.), Chemistry Education in the Light of the Research (pp. 118–123). Pedagogical University of Krakow. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Testa, I., Monroy, G., & Sassi, E. (2002). Students’ reading images in kinematics: the case of real-time graphs. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078897 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Tho, S.W., & Hussain, B. (2011). The development of a microcomputer-based laboratory (MBL) system for gas pressure law experiment via open source software. International Journal of Education & Development using Information & Communication Technology, 7(1), 42–55. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Thornton, R.K. (1991). Using the microcomputer-based laboratory to improve student conceptual understanding in physics. Turkish Journal of Physics, 15(2), 316–335. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Thornton, R.K., & Sokoloff, D.R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16350 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Tinker, R.F. (1984). Microcomputers in the lab: Techniques and applications. Technical Educational Research Center. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Tinker, R.F. (2000). A history of probeware. The Concord Consortium. [online] https://concord.org/sites/default/files/pdf/probeware history.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Tolvanen, S. (2012, nepublikované). Could oceans save us from climate change? Project No. 517587-LLP-1-2011-1-ES-COMENIUS-CMP. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Tortosa Moreno, M. (2012). The use of microcomputer based laboratories in chemistry secondary education: Present state of the art and ideas for research-based practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP00019A Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Tortosa Moreno, M., Skoršepa, M., Guitart Mas, J., Urban-Woldron, H., Aksela, M.K., Tolvanen, S., Stratilová Urválková, E., & Šmejkal, P. (2013). Design of research-based lab sheets for the acquisition of science competencies using ICT real-time experiments. Do students get the point of what they are doing? In C.P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, & A. Hadjigeorgiu, E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference “Science Education Research For Evidence-based Teaching and Coherence in Learning”, Strand 4. (pp. 695–703). Nicosia, Cyprus, European Science Education Research Association. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Trumper, R., & Gelbman, M.A. (2001). Microcomputer-Based Contribution to Scientific and Technological Literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016673931746 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Urban-Woldron, H., Tortosa Moreno, M., & Skoršepa, M. (2013). Implementing learning with sensors in science education: Students’ motivational orientations toward using MBL. In In C. P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, & A. Hadjigeorgiu (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference “Science education research for Vyhledej v Google Scholar
evidence-based teaching and coherence in learning”, Strand 4. (pp. 848–854). Nicosia, Cyprus, European Science Education Research Association. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Vernier Software & Technology. (2019). Company website (homepage). https://www.vernier.com/ Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Volk, M., Cotič, M., Zajc, M., & Starcic, A. I. (2017). Tablet-based cross-curricular maths vs. traditional maths classroom practice for higher-order learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 114, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Voogt, J., Tilya, F., & Akker, J. (2009). Science teacher learning of MBL-supported student-centered science education in the context of secondary education in Tanzania. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9160-8 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Ward, N.D., Finley, R. J., Keil, R. G., & Clay, T.G. (2013). Benefits and limitations of iPads in the high school science classroom and a trophic cascade lesson plan. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 378–384. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
White, R.T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. Routledge. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Yang, X., Li, X., & Lu, T. (2015). Using mobile phones in college classroom settings: Effects of presentation mode and interest on concentration and achievement. Computers & Education, 88, 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.007 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Yeung, A., Pyke, S.M., Sharma, M.D., Barrie, S., Buntine, M.A., Burke da Silva, K., Kable, S.H., & Lim, K. F. (2011). The advancing science by enhancing learning in the laboratory (ASELL) project: The first Australian multidisciplinary workshop. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics, 19(2), 51–72. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Zelenický, Ľ., Valovičová, Ľ., Jenisová, Z., & Štubňa, M. (2011). Počítačom podporované experimenty. UKF. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

Licence

Autoři, kteří publikují v tomto časopise, souhlasí s následujícími body:

Autoři si ponechávají copyright a garantují časopisu právo prvního publikování, přitom je práce zároveň licencována pod Creative Commons Attribution licencí, která umožňuje ostatním sdílet tuto práci s tím, že přiznají jejího autora a první publikování v tomto časopisu.
Autoři mohou vstupovat do dalších samostatných smluvních dohod pro neexkluzivní šíření práce ve verzi, ve které byla publikována v časopise (například publikovat ji v knize), avšak s tím, že přiznají její první publikování v tomto časopisu.
Autorům je dovoleno a doporučováno, aby zpřístupnili svou práci online (například na svých webových stránkách) před a v průběhu redakčního řízení jejich příspěvku, protože takový postup může vést k produktivním výměnám názorů a také dřívější a vyšší citovanosti publikované práce (Viz Efekt otevřeného přístupu).

[1] Ambrose, B. S. (2004). Investigating student understanding in intermediate mechanics: Identifying the need for a tutorial approach to instruction. American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1648684 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[2] Aksela, M.K. (2005). Supporting meaningful chemistry learning and higher-order thinking through computer-assisted inquiry: A design research approach [Dizertačná práca]. University of Helsinki. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[3] Aksela, M.K. (2011). Engaging students for meaningful chemistry learning through microcomputer-based laboratory (MBL) inquiry. Educació Química EduQ, 9, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2003.02.66 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[4] ASELL – Advancing science by enhancing learning in the laboratory website. (2014). http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/asell/asell.site/ Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[5] Atar, H.Y. (2002). Chemistry students’ challenges in using MBL’s in science laboratories. In P.A. Rubba, J.A. Rye, W. J. DiBiase, & B.A. Crawford (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp. 2–23). Charlotte, Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[6] Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[7] Barton, R. (1997). How do computers affect graphical interpretation? School Science Review, 79(287), 55–60. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[8] Beichner, R. J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270809 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[9] Bernhard, J. (2003). Physics learning and microcomputer based laboratory (MBL) learning – effects of using MBL as a technological and as a cognitive tool. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science Education Research in the Knowledge-Based Society (pp. 323–331). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[10] Bílek, M., Kričfaluši, D., Budweiserová, K., & Danielová, M. (2002). Digitální váhy a počítač ve výuce chemie. In M. Bílek (Ed.), Profil učitele chemie II.: Sborník příspěvků z jednání v sekcích XI. mezinárodní konference o výuce chemie (s. 206–209). Gaudeamus. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[11] Borghi, L., De Ambrosis, A., Lunati, E., & Mascheretti, P. (2001). In-service teacher education: An attempt to link reflection on physics subjects with teaching practice. Physics Education, 36(4), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/36/4/303 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[12] Brasell, H. (1987a). Effectiveness of a microcomputer-based laboratory in learning distance and velocity graphs [Dizertačná práca]. University of Florida. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[13] Brasell, H. (1987b). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240409 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[14] Buntine, M.A., Read, J.R., Barrie, S. C., Bucat, R.B., Crisp, G.T., George, A.V., Jamie, I.M., & Kable, S.H. (2007). Advancing chemistry by enhancing learning in the laboratory (ACELL): A model for providing professional and personal development and facilitating improved student laboratory learning outcomes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90033J Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[15] Chen, G., Chang, C., & Wang, C. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers & Education, 50(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[16] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[17] Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[18] Čtrnáctová, H., Čížková, V., Hlavová, L., & Řezníčková, D. (2012). Dovednosti žáků v badatelsky orientované výuce chemie. In J. Reguli (Ed.), Zborník z medzinárodnej konferencie „Aktuálne trendy vo vyučovaní prírodných vied (Smolenice 2012) (s. 31–36). Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[19] Euler, M., & Müller, A. (1999). Physics learning and the computer: A review, with a taste of meta-analysis. In M. Komorek, H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, & A. Kross (Eds.), Second International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (pp. 1–3). Kiel, European Science Education Research Association. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[20] Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th edition. SAGE Publications. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[21] Fu, Q., & Hwang, Q. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[22] Gašparík, V. (2014) Školské počítačové meracie systémy vo vyučovaní chémie na základnej škole. Biológia, ekológia, chémia, 18(4), 48–53. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[23] George, A.V., Read, J.R., Barrie, S. C., Bucat, R.B., Buntine, M.A., Crisp, G.T., Jamie, I. M., & Kable, S.H. (2009). What makes a good laboratory learning exercise? Student feedback from the ACELL project. In M. Gupta-Bhowon, S. Jhaumeer-Laulloo, H. Li Kam Wah, & P. Ramasami (Eds.), Chemistry Education in the ICT Age (pp. 363–376). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9732-4 34 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[24] Gilbert, J.K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[25] Haksiz, M. (2014). Investigation of tablet computer use in special education teachers’ courses. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1392–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.240 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[26] Hedlington, L., White, H., & Curtis, S. (2019). “I cannot live without my [tablet]”: Children’s experiences of using tablet technology within the home. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.043 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[27] Held, Ľ., Žoldošová, K., Orolínová, M., Juricová, I., & Kotuľáková, K. (2011). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania (IBSE v slovenskom kontexte). Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[28] Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90027H Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[29] Horváthová, E. (2018). Počítačom podporované experimenty s dotykovými koncovými zariadeniami [Diplomová práca]. FPV UMB. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[30] Ješková, Z. (2004) Počítačom podporované experimenty z termiky a termodynamiky v prostredí IP COACH. Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[31] Johnstone, A.H. (2010). You can’t get there from here! Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800026d Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[32] Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. (2004). Education & technology. An encyclopedia. ABC Clio. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[33] Lavonen, J., Aksela, M., Juuti, K., & Meisalo, V. (2003). Designing user-friendly datalogging for chemical education through factor analysis of teacher evaluations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1471–1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072755 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[34] Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. (2011). Science learning and instruction. Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Routledge. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[35] Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Routledge. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[36] Linn, M. C., Layman, J.W., & Nachmias, R. (1987). Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(87)80029-2 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[37] Linn, M. C., & Songer, N.B. (1991). Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 885–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660281003 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[38] Liu, Ch., Wu, Ch., Wong, W., Lien, Y., & Chao, T. (2017). Scientific modeling with mobile devices in high school physics labs. Computers & Education, 105, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[39] Mamlok-Naaman, R., Eilks, I., Bodner, G., & Hofstein, A. (2018). Professional development of chemistry teacher. Theory and practice. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[40] Mang, C., Brown, N., & Piper, L. (2017). “Old school” meets “new school”: Using books and tablets to improve information literacy and promote integrative learning among business students. The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.07.003 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[41] Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D.R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[42] Marcum-Dietrich, N. I., & Ford, D. J. (2002). The Place for the computer is in the laboratory: An investigation of the effect of computer probeware on student learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(4), 361–379. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[43] Metcalf, S. J., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Probeware and handhelds in elementary and middle school science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019637.22473.02 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[44] Mokros, J.R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children’s ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240408 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[45] Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Courtois, C., Schellens, T., & Marez, L. (2014). A qualitative study about the implementation of tablet computers in secondary education: The teachers’ role in this process. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1192 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[46] Nachmias, R., & Linn, M. (1987). Evaluations of science laboratory data: The role of computer-presented information. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240509 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[47] Oliemat, E., Ihmeideh, F., & Alkhawaldeh, M. (2018). The use of touch-screen tablets in early childhood: Children’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards tablet technology. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.028 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[48] Pierri, E., Karatrantou, A., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2008). Exploring the phenomenon of change of phase of pure substances using the microcomputer-based-laboratory (MBL) system. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1039/B812412B Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[49] Priest, S. J., Pyke, S.M., & Williamson, N.M. (2014). Student perceptions of chemistry experiments with different technological interfaces: A comparative study. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1787–1795. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400835h Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[50] Rane, L. (2013). The effectiveness of MBL experiments in developing conceptual understanding in kinematics among undergraduate physics students. In T. Bastiaens, & G. Marks (Eds.), World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Las Vegas) (pp. 2495–2502). San Diego, USA, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[51] Redish, E. F., Saul, J.M., & Steinberg, R.N. (1997). On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 65(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18498 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[52] Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.019 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[53] Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight. Children’s media use in America. Report of Common sense media’s program for the study of children and media. Common Sence Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/file/zerotoeightfinal2011pdf-0/download Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[54] Rogers, L.T. (1995). Computer as an aid for exploring graphs. School Science Review, 76(276), 31–39. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. 2nd ed. CA. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[55] Russell, D.W., Lucas, K.B., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). The role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in kinematics. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10129 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[56] Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[57] Sassi, E., Monroy, G., & Testa, I. (2005). Teacher training about real-time approaches: Research-based guidelines and training materials. Science Education, 89(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20041 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[58] Schauer, F., Lustig, F., Dvořák, J., & Ožvoldová, M. (2008). An easy-to-build remote laboratory with data transfer using the Internet School Experimental System. European Journal of Physics, 29(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/29/4/010 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[59] Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2013). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. UNESCO working paper series on mobile learning. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219637 Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[60] Simsek, M., & Dogru, I.A. (2014). Tablet Pc based clasroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4246–4249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.925 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[61] Skoršepa, M. (2012). Ako „uhasiť pálenie záhy – príklad školského chemického experimentu s podporou výpočtovej techniky. Biológia, ekológia, chémia, 16(3–4), 8–11. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[62] Skoršepa, M. (2014). Stomach acid and antacids. Project No. 517587-LLP-1-2011-1-ES-COMENIUS-CMP. [online] http://comblab.uab.cat/ Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[63] Skoršepa, M. (2015). Počítačom podporované experimenty v prírodovednom vzdelávaní. Belianum (Vydavateľstvo UMB). Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[64] Skoršepa, M., & Melicherčík, M. (2001). Zaujímavé kontinuálne merania z chémie uskutočňované SM Systémom. In Proceedings of II. Conference for Ph.D. students (pp. 254–258). Nitra, FPV UKF. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[65] Skoršepa, M., Stratilová Urválková, E., Šmejkal, P., Tortosa Moreno, M., & Urban-Woldron, H. (2014). Activities with sensors in laboratory of biology: Students’ motivation and understanding the results. In M. Nodzy´nska„ P. Cie´sla, & A. Kania (Eds.), Experiments in teaching and learning natural sciences (pp. 25–33). Pedagogical University of Krakow. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[66] Skoršepa, M., & Šmejkal, P. (2018). Comprehending Computer Based Laboratory Activities by Slovak and Czech Students. In P. Ciesla, & A. Michniewska (Eds.), Science Teaching in the XXI Century (pp. 72–82). Pedagogical University of Krakow. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[67] Skoršepa, M., & Tortosa Moreno, M. (2014). Faktory ovplyvňujúce motivačnú orientáciu žiakov v počítačom podporovanom laboratóriu. Acta Universitatis Matthiae Belii, ser. chem., 15, 84–91. SPSS INC. PASW Statistics for Windows. (2009). Ver. 18.0. SPSS Inc., Ed. 2009. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[68] Stein, J. S. (1987). The computer as lab partner: Classroom experience gleaned from one year of Microcomputer-Based Laboratory use. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 15(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.2190/12PK-CDVR-EGP4-XDLW Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[69] Svec, M. (1999). Improving graphing intrepretation skills and understanding of motion using microcomputer based laboratories. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[70] Šmejkal, P., & Stratilová Urválková, E. (2011). Školní měřicí systémy pro výuku chemie – mají o ně žáci vůbec zájem? In M. Ulrich, & K. Zatloukal (Eds.), Alternativní metody výuky 2011, 9. ročník mezinárodní konference (s. 1–9). Gaudeamus. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[71] Šmejkal, P., & Stratilová Urválková, E. (2012). Support for use of probeware in science for teachers and pupils. In P. Ciesla et al. (Eds.), Chemistry Education in the Light of the Research (pp. 118–123). Pedagogical University of Krakow. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[72] Testa, I., Monroy, G., & Sassi, E. (2002). Students’ reading images in kinematics: the case of real-time graphs. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078897 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[73] Tho, S.W., & Hussain, B. (2011). The development of a microcomputer-based laboratory (MBL) system for gas pressure law experiment via open source software. International Journal of Education & Development using Information & Communication Technology, 7(1), 42–55. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[74] Thornton, R.K. (1991). Using the microcomputer-based laboratory to improve student conceptual understanding in physics. Turkish Journal of Physics, 15(2), 316–335. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[75] Thornton, R.K., & Sokoloff, D.R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16350 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[76] Tinker, R.F. (1984). Microcomputers in the lab: Techniques and applications. Technical Educational Research Center. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[77] Tinker, R.F. (2000). A history of probeware. The Concord Consortium. [online] https://concord.org/sites/default/files/pdf/probeware history.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[78] Tolvanen, S. (2012, nepublikované). Could oceans save us from climate change? Project No. 517587-LLP-1-2011-1-ES-COMENIUS-CMP. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[79] Tortosa Moreno, M. (2012). The use of microcomputer based laboratories in chemistry secondary education: Present state of the art and ideas for research-based practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP00019A Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[80] Tortosa Moreno, M., Skoršepa, M., Guitart Mas, J., Urban-Woldron, H., Aksela, M.K., Tolvanen, S., Stratilová Urválková, E., & Šmejkal, P. (2013). Design of research-based lab sheets for the acquisition of science competencies using ICT real-time experiments. Do students get the point of what they are doing? In C.P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, & A. Hadjigeorgiu, E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference “Science Education Research For Evidence-based Teaching and Coherence in Learning”, Strand 4. (pp. 695–703). Nicosia, Cyprus, European Science Education Research Association. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[81] Trumper, R., & Gelbman, M.A. (2001). Microcomputer-Based Contribution to Scientific and Technological Literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016673931746 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[82] Urban-Woldron, H., Tortosa Moreno, M., & Skoršepa, M. (2013). Implementing learning with sensors in science education: Students’ motivational orientations toward using MBL. In In C. P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, & A. Hadjigeorgiu (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference “Science education research for Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[83] evidence-based teaching and coherence in learning”, Strand 4. (pp. 848–854). Nicosia, Cyprus, European Science Education Research Association. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[84] Vernier Software & Technology. (2019). Company website (homepage). https://www.vernier.com/ Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[85] Volk, M., Cotič, M., Zajc, M., & Starcic, A. I. (2017). Tablet-based cross-curricular maths vs. traditional maths classroom practice for higher-order learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 114, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.004 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[86] Voogt, J., Tilya, F., & Akker, J. (2009). Science teacher learning of MBL-supported student-centered science education in the context of secondary education in Tanzania. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9160-8 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[87] Ward, N.D., Finley, R. J., Keil, R. G., & Clay, T.G. (2013). Benefits and limitations of iPads in the high school science classroom and a trophic cascade lesson plan. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 378–384. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[88] White, R.T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. Routledge. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[89] Yang, X., Li, X., & Lu, T. (2015). Using mobile phones in college classroom settings: Effects of presentation mode and interest on concentration and achievement. Computers & Education, 88, 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.007 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[90] Yeung, A., Pyke, S.M., Sharma, M.D., Barrie, S., Buntine, M.A., Burke da Silva, K., Kable, S.H., & Lim, K. F. (2011). The advancing science by enhancing learning in the laboratory (ASELL) project: The first Australian multidisciplinary workshop. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics, 19(2), 51–72. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[91] Zelenický, Ľ., Valovičová, Ľ., Jenisová, Z., & Štubňa, M. (2011). Počítačom podporované experimenty. UKF. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[92] Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Tablet alebo notebook? Komparatívna štúdia žiakovho vnímania rozdielnych technologických prístupov v počítačom podporovanom chemickom laboratóriu

Jak citovat

Abstrakt

Reference

Stažení

Licence

Nejčtenější články stejného autora (stejných autorů)