Active Physics Learning: Making Possible Students’ Cognitive Growth, Positive Emotions and Amazing Creativity

Josip Sliško

doi:10.14712/18047106.733

Vol 8 (2017): Keynotes and selected papers from the International Conference on Physics Education, ICPE-EPEC 2013 (Special Issue) Keynote lectures

Active Physics Learning: Making Possible Students’ Cognitive Growth, Positive Emotions and Amazing Creativity

Josip Sliško, ¹

Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Matematicko-fyzikální fakulta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.733

PDF (angličtina)

Jak citovat

Sliško, J. (2017). Active Physics Learning: Making Possible Students’ Cognitive Growth, Positive Emotions and Amazing Creativity. Scientia in educatione, 8. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.733

Stánhout citace

Abstrakt

It is now well known that carefully designed sequences of active physics learning support students’ comprehension of physical concepts and laws. If only this were its eﬀect, active learning should replace lecture-based teaching and passive students’ learning at all educational levels. Fortunately, the impacts of active learning experiences in students are much broader. In this paper I present a few examples of tasks that are suited for engaging students in active learning along with research-based and anecdotal evidence about eﬀects of active physics learning on students’ cognitive level, emotions and creativity.

Licence

Autoři, kteří publikují v tomto časopise, souhlasí s následujícími body:

Autoři si ponechávají copyright a garantují časopisu právo prvního publikování, přitom je práce zároveň licencována pod Creative Commons Attribution licencí, která umožňuje ostatním sdílet tuto práci s tím, že přiznají jejího autora a první publikování v tomto časopisu.
Autoři mohou vstupovat do dalších samostatných smluvních dohod pro neexkluzivní šíření práce ve verzi, ve které byla publikována v časopise (například publikovat ji v knize), avšak s tím, že přiznají její první publikování v tomto časopisu.
Autorům je dovoleno a doporučováno, aby zpřístupnili svou práci online (například na svých webových stránkách) před a v průběhu redakčního řízení jejich příspěvku, protože takový postup může vést k produktivním výměnám názorů a také dřívější a vyšší citovanosti publikované práce (Viz Efekt otevřeného přístupu).

[1] Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 4(2), Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[2] –109. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[3] Ayala, H., Slisko, J. & Corona, A. (2011). Magnetic demonstration of weightlessness: A Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[4] spark of student creativity. The Physics Teacher, 49 (8), 524–525. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[5] Barbot, B., Besan¸con, M. & Lubart, T. I. (2011). Assessing Creativity in the Classroom. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[6] In The Open Education Journal 4, Supplement 1: M5, 58–66. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[7] Beichner, R. J. (1999, unpublished). Student-Centered Activities for Large-Enrollment Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[8] University Physics (SCALE UP). Lecture presented at the Sigma Xi Forum: Reshaping Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[9] Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education: Tools for Better Learning, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[10] Minneapolis. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[11] Belcher, J. (2013). MIT Physics Department’s experience with edX. MIT Faculty Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[12] Newsletter, 26(1), 12–14. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[13] Bonello, C. & Scaife, J. (2009). PEOR: Engaging students in demonstrations. Journal of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[14] Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(1), 62–84. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[15] Bonwell, C.C. & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning. Creating excitement in the Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[16] classroom. Washington: The George Washington University. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[17] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2001). How people learn. Brain, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[18] mind, experience, and school. Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[19] Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[20] Bransford, J. D. & Stein, B. S. (1993). The ideal problem solver. A guide for improving Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[21] thinking, learning and creativity. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[22] Cheng, V. M. (2004). Developing physics learning activities for fostering student Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[23] creativity in Hong Kong context. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[24] (2), 1–33. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[25] Corona, A., SliËsko, J. & Planinsic, G. (2006). Rising freely bottle also demonstrates Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[26] weightlessness. Physics Education, 41(3), 8–9. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[27] Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E. & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[28] Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[29] Dori, Y. J. & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[30] undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[31] the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[32] Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[33] Management Review, 41(2), 79–94. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[34] Drucker, P. F. (2005). Managing Oneself. Harvard Business Review, 83(1), 100–109. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[35] Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C.F. & Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[36] learning physics. Science Education, 76(6), 615–652. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[37] Etkina, E. & Van Heuvelen, A. (2007). Investigative science learning environment — A Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[38] science process approach to learning physics. In Redish, E. F., Cooney, P. J. (Eds.), Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[39] Research-based reform of university physics. College Park, MD: American Association of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[40] Physics Teachers. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[41] Galili, I. (1995). Interpretation of students’ understanding of the concept of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[42] weightlessness. Research in Science Education, 25(1), 51–74. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[43] Galili, I. (1996). Students’ conceptual change in geometrical optics.International Journal Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[44] of Science Education, 18(7), 847–868. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[45] Galili, I. (2001). Weight versus gravitational force: Historical and educational Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[46] perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1073–1093. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[47] Gautreau, R. & Novemsky, L. (1997). Concepts first — a small group approach to Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[48] physics learning. American Journal of Physics, 65(5), 418–428. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[49] Graham, P.A. (Ed.). (2002). Knowledge Economy and Postsecondary Education: Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[50] Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[51] Gregerson, M. B., Snyder, H.T. & Kaufman, J.C. (2013). Teaching Creatively and Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[52] Teaching Creativity. New York: Springer. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[53] Gregory, E., Hardiman, M., Yarmolinskaya, J., Rinne, L. & Limb, C. (2013). Building Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[54] creative thinking in the classroom: From research to practice. International Journal of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[55] Educational Research, 62, 43–50. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[56] Gürel, Z. & Acar, H. (2003). Research into students’ views about basic physics principles Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[57] in a weightless environment. Astronomy Education Review, 2(1), 65–81. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[58] Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[59] student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[60] Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[61] Harmin, M. (1994). Inspiring active learning. A handbook for teachers. Alexandria: Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[62] Association for Supervion and Curriculum Development. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[63] Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[64] –598. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[65] Hoellwarth, C., Moelter, M. J. & Knight, R. D. (2005). A direct comparison of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[66] conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[67] classrooms. American Journal of Physics, 73(5), 459–463. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[68] Jarvis, P. (Ed.). (2001). The Age of Learning: Education and the Knowledge Society. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[69] London: Taylor and Francis Group. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[70] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[71] Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[72] Science, 40(4), 651–672. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[73] Keeling, R.P. & Hersh, R.H. (2012). We’re Losing Our Minds. Rethinking American Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[74] Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[75] Lewin, W. (2012). For the Love of Physics: From the end of the rainbow to the edge of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[76] time — a journey through the wonders of physics. New York: Simon and Schuster. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[77] Lewin, W. (1999). Lecture 7. Available at http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-01- Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[78] physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/video-lectures/lecture-7/ Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[79] Laws, P. (1991). Workshop Physics: Learning introductory physics by doing it. Change: Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[80] The Magazine of Higher Learning, 23(4), 20–27. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[81] Laws, P.W. (1996). Workshop Physics Activity Guide Modules 1–4, New York: John Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[82] Wiley and Sons. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[83] Laws, P.W. (1997). Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[84] education research in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 65(1), Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[85] –21. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[86] Low, R. & Jin, P. (2012). Self-regulated learning. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[87] Learning (3015–3018). New York: Springer. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[88] Marusic, M. & Slisko, J. (2012a). Influence of three different methods of teaching physics Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[89] on the gain in students’ development of reasoning. International Journal of Science Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[90] Education, 34(2), 301–326. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[91] Marusic, M. & Slisko, J. (2012b). Effects of two different types of physics learning on the Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[92] results of CLASS test. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[93] (1), 010107. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[94] Marusic, M. & Slisko, J. (2012c). Increasing the attractiveness of school physics: The Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[95] effects of two different designs of physics learning. Revista Mexicana de F´ısica E, 58(1), Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[96] –83. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[97] Marusic, M. & Slisko, J. (2012d). Many high-school students don’t want to study Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[98] physics: active learning experiences can change this negative attitude! Revista Brasileira Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[99] de Ensino de F´ısica, 34(3), 3401. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[100] Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[101] McDermott, L.C. (1991). Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned — Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[102] Closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59(4), 301–315. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[103] McDermott, L.C. (1993). Guest Comment: How we teach and how students learn — A Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[104] mismatch? American Journal of Physics, 61(4), 295–298. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[105] Meltzer, D.E. & Thornton, R.K. (2012). Resource letter ALIP-1: Active-learning Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[106] instruction in physics. American Journal of Physics, 80(6), 478–496. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[107] Michalewicz, Z. & Michalewicz, M. (2008). Puzzle-based learning: Introduction to Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[108] critical thinking, mathematics, and problem solving. Melbourne: Hybrid Publishers. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[109] Perkins, D. (2000). Archimedes’ bathtub. The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[110] New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[111] Piaget, J. (1930). The child’s conception of physical causality. Oxford: Harcourt, Brace Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[112] & Company. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[113] Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills. How to embed creativity into the Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[114] curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[115] Pintrich, P.R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. New directions for teaching Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[116] and learning, 63, 3–12. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[117] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[118] Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[119] Rivera Hern´andez, S. & Slisko, J. (2005). Levantar dos vasos mediante un globo: usando Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[120] un truco de fiestas para enseËnar y aprender la naturaleza de la f´ısica. Memor´ıas del Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[121] taller internacional “Nuevas Tendencias en la EnseËnanza de la F´ısica”. Puebla: Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[122] Facultad de Ciencias F´ısico-Matem´aticas. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[123] Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[124] Scott, T., Gray, A. & Yates, P. (2013). A controlled comparison of teaching methods in Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[125] first-year university physics. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 43(2), 88–99. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[126] Sharma, M. D., Millar, R. M., Smith, A. & Sefton, I.M. (2004). Students’ understandings Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[127] of gravity in an orbiting space-ship. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 267–289. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[128] Sigler, L. E. (2003). Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci. Leonardo Pisano’s Book of Calculation. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[129] First soft edition. New York: Springer. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[130] Siler, S. A., Klahr, D. & Price, N. (2013). Investigating the mechanisms of learning from Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[131] a constrained preparation for future learning activity. Instructional Science, 41(1), Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[132] –216. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[133] Singmaster, D. (2004). Sources in recreational mathematics. An annotated bibliography. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[134] Eight preliminary edition. Available at Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[135] http://puzzlemuseum.com/singma/singma6/SOURCES/singma-sources-edn8-2004-03-

[136] htm#Toc69534276 Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[137] Slisko, J. (2010). “Total force” on bodies immersed in air and water: An error living Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[138] three centuries in physics textbooks. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[139] Education, 4(1), 5–23. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[140] Slisko, J. (2011). Repeated errors in physics textbooks: What do they say about the Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[141] culture of teaching? In Raine, D., Hurkett, C. & Rogers, L. (Eds.), Physics Community Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[142] and Cooperation. Vol. 2, Proceedings of the GIREP-EPEC & PHEC 2009 International Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[143] Conference, Leicester: Lulu / The Center for Interdisciplinary Science, University of Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[144] Leicester, 31–46. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[145] Thacker, B., Kim, E., Trefz, K. & Lea, S.M. (1994). Comparing problem solving Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[146] performance of physics students in inquiry-based and traditional introductory physics Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[147] courses. American Journal of Physics, 62(7), 627–633. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[148] Tural, G., Akdeniz, A.R. & Alev, N. (2010). Effect of 5E teaching model on student Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[149] teachers’ understanding of weightlessness. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[150] (5), 470–488. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[151] Wagner, T. (2008). Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20–25. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[152] Wells, D. (2012). Games and mathematics. Subtle connections. New York: Cambridge Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[153] University Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[154] Wells, M., Hestenes, D. & Swackhamer, G. (1995). A modeling method for high school Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[155] physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 63(7), 606–619. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[156] White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding. London and New York: Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[157] Falmer Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[158] Wieman, C. & Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics Today, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[159] (11), 26–41. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[160] Wilson, J.M. (1994). The CUPLE physics studio. The Physics Teacher, 32(9), 518–523. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[161] Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[162] overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[163] Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[164] practice, 41(2), 64–67. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[165] Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D.H. (Eds.). (2013). Self-regulated learning and academic Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[166] achievement: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Routledge. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Active Physics Learning: Making Possible Students’ Cognitive Growth, Positive Emotions and Amazing Creativity

Jak citovat

Abstrakt

Reference

Stažení

Licence

Nejčtenější články stejného autora (stejných autorů)