Monitorovanie kognitívneho vývinu vo vzdelávacom programe ExpEdícia: Môže kognitívny vývin odrážať vplyv vzdelávacieho prostredia?

Dominika Koperová; Ľubomír Held

doi:10.14712/18047106.2133

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022): Scientia in educatione Research Reports

Monitoring of cognitive development in teaching programme ExpEdition: Can cognitive development reflect the influence of the learning environment?

Dominika Koperová, ¹ Ľubomír Held,

Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej Univerzity

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.2133

PDF (Czech)

How to Cite

Koperová, D., & Held, Ľ. (2023). Monitoring of cognitive development in teaching programme ExpEdition: Can cognitive development reflect the influence of the learning environment? Scientia in Educatione, 13(2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.2133

Download Citation

Abstract

An innovative view of science education is presented by the teaching programme ExpEdition – try, explore, discover. It offers the opportunity to teach science through systematically applied IBSE elements, space for teacher training and the preparation of appropriate teaching and methodological materials. The aim is to provide an insight into the monitoring of the cognitive development of long-term learners in the programme and at the same time to compare them with students learning in the traditional way, mostly by interpretation. The Inventory of Piaget’s Developmental Tasks (IPDT) test, which monitors the cognitive level attained by the pupil, and the Bipolar Statement Scale (BSS), which monitors the ability to grasp abstract content, were administered in the classroom. The results show a difference between lower secondary school pupils aged 14–15 years learning traditionally (12 schools, 14 classes, 287 pupils) and those learning by ExpEdition (2 schools, 4 classes, 83 pupils) in all the parameters studied (IPDT by 10 points, misconceptions by 2 points). Given that
the results of the pupils involved in the programme appear to be significantly better than those of traditional pupils, it can be assumed that the learning environment created for the pupils in the project has a positive impact on their achievement.

Keywords Science education Cognitive development Learning environment IPDT

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J.W., & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Altbach, P. G. (1991). Introduction. In P.G. Altbach (Eds.), Textbooks in American Society (pp. 1–6). State University of New York Press. Search in Google Scholar
Atkin, J. M., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5), 45–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24146536 Search in Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802 3 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Bates, A.W. (2016). What is a learning environment?. In W.A. Bates (Ed.), Teaching in a digital age.Pressbooks. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/chapter/5-2-what-is-a-learning-environment/ Search in Google Scholar
Benedikovičová, Z. (2013). Konštruktivistický prístup k vyučovaniu o chemickej väzbe v podmienkach základného vzdelávania. [Dizertačná práca, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave]. Search in Google Scholar
Bernard, P., Maciejowska, I., Krzeczkowska, M., & Odrow¸a˙z, E. (2015). Influence of in-service teacher training on their opinions about IBSE. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.343 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Brianzoni, V., & Cardellini, L. (2015). Science education in Italy: Critical and desirable aspect of learning environments. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(5), 1648–3898. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.685 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Broďáni, J. (2005). Effect size – veľkosť účinku ako prostriedok posúdenia významnosti rozdielov priemerov skupín. In K. Félix, P. Gles, & J. Kasa, Adaptácia v tréningovom procese: Elektronický zborník z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. STU Bratislava. Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, R.W., & Landes, N. M. (1990). Science for life and living: An elementary school science program for Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. The American Biology Teacher, 52(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449042 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., van Scooter, P., Powell, J. C., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5e instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. BSCS. https://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs 5e executive summary.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Coleman, S. L., & Gotch, A. J. (1998). Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p206 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O.E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In O. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, & C. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning. Contributions from science education research (vol. 5, pp. 1–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0 1 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Čáp, J., & Mareš, J. (2001). Psychologie po učitele. Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Donnelly, D. F., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2014). ‘Just be quiet and listen to exactly what he’s saying’: Conceptualising power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2029–2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.889867 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Dorman, J.P., Aldridge, J.M., & Fraser, B. J. (2006). Using students’ assessment of classroom environment to develop a typology of secondary school classrooms. International Education Journal, 7(7), 906–915. Search in Google Scholar
Duran, L. B., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E Instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. The Science Education Review, 3(2), 49–58. Search in Google Scholar
Fan, J., & Zhang, L. (2014). The role of learning environments in thinking styles. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.817538 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, B. J. (1999). Using learning environment assessment to improve classroom and school climates. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 65–83). RoutledgeFalmer. Search in Google Scholar
Furth, H. (1970). An inventory of Piaget’s developmental tasks. Center for Research in Thinking and Language. Search in Google Scholar
Gokdere, M., & Calik, M. (2010). A cross-age study of Turkish students’ mental models: An atom concept. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 2, 185–199. Search in Google Scholar
Grecmanová, H. (2008). Klima školy. Hanex. Search in Google Scholar
Grecmanová, H., Urbanovská, E., Gonda, D., & Cabanová, V. (2020). Teachers didactic competencies when teaching natural science subject as s learning environment factor. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(12), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3678834 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290609 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Ashford Colour Press Ltd. Search in Google Scholar
Harlen, W. (2015). Working with big ideas of science education. Science Education Programme (SEP) of IAP. Search in Google Scholar
Härmälä-Braskén, A., Hemmi, K., & Kurtén, B. (2020). Misconceptions in chemistry among Finnish prospective primary school teachers – a long-term study. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1447–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1765046 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Heikkila, A., Lonka, K., Nieminen, J., & Niemvirta, M. (2012). Relations between teacher students’ approaches to learning, cognitive and attributional strategies, well-being, and study success. Higher Education, 64, 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9504-9 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Heinz, J., Enghag, M., Stuchlikova, I., Cakmakci, G., Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2016). Impact of initiatives to implement science inquiry: A comparative study of the Turkish, Israeli, Swedish and Czech science education systems. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12, 677–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9704-6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Held, Ľ. (2014). Induktívno-deduktívna dimenzia prírodovedného vzdelávania. Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Search in Google Scholar
Held, Ľ., & Pupala, B. (1995). Psychogenéza žiakovho poznávania vo vyučovaní. PedF UK. Search in Google Scholar
Held, Ľ., Bronerská, J., Čipková, E., Demkanin, P., Drozdíková, A., Fančovičová, J., Horváth, P., Hlavatá Hudáčková, N., Kotuľáková, K., Kováčová, L., Lapitková, V., Michalisková, R., Nagyová, S., Orolínová, M., Prokša, M., Ušáková, K., & Velmovská, K. (2019). Koncepcia prírodovedného kurikula pre základnú školu 2020. Veda. Search in Google Scholar
Held, Ľ., Bronerská, J., Koperová, D., & Kotuľáková, K. (2021a). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Chémia pre 8. ročník ZŠ a pre terciu osemročných gymnázií. Pilotná verzia. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Held, Ľ., Bronerská, J., Kotuľáková, K., Kováčová, L., & Orolínová, M. (2021b). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Chémia pre 7. ročník ZŠ a pre sekundu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Held, Ľ., Žoldošová, K., Orolínová, M., Juricová, I., & Kotuľáková, K. (2011). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania (IBSE v slovenskom kontexte). Trnavská univerzita v Trnave. Indícia. (2021). Expedícia – skús, skúmaj, spoznaj. https://www.indicia.sk/aktualne-skolenia/expedicia?start=6 Search in Google Scholar
Jelemenská, P., Sander, E., & Kattmann, U. (2003). Model didaktickej rekonštrukcie. Impulz pre výskum v odborových didaktikách. Pedagogika, 53(2), 190–201. Search in Google Scholar
Knecht, P. (2007). Didaktická transformace aneb od „didaktického zjednodušení" k „didaktické rekonstrukci". Orbis scholae, 2(1), 67–81. Search in Google Scholar
Kollárik, K. (1997). Projekt FAST a kognitívny vývin žiakov 8-ročných gymnázií. In V. Lapitková (Ed.), Zborník z konferencie FAST – DISCO (s. 95–100). R&D Print. Search in Google Scholar
Koperová, D., & Held, Ľ. (2021a). Didaktická rekonštrucia témy atóm a jeho štruktúra. In V. Machková (Ed.), 16. Medzinárodní seminář doktorandů didaktiky chemie a příbuzných doktorských programů (s. 21–27). Univerzita Hradec Králové. Search in Google Scholar
Koperová, D., & Held, Ľ. (2021b). K validizácii výrokovej škály pri skúmaní miskoncepcií v oblasti poznatkov o stavbe atómu. In V. Švandová, J. Literák, & B. Pelánková (Eds.), Sborník konference didaktiky přírodních věd DidSci+ 2021 (s. 49–59). MUNI PRESS. https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9876-2021-6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Koperová, D., Held, Ľ., & Kotuľáková, K. (2020). Analysis of the atom and its structure in chemistry textbooks. In M. Rusek, M. Tóthová, & K. Vojíř (Eds.), Project-based education and other activating strategies in science education, XVII. (pp. 79–87). Charles University, Faculty of Education. Search in Google Scholar
Kotuľáková, K. (2020). Výučba chémie ako ExpEdícia. Biológia, ekológia, chémia, 24(4), 21–21. Search in Google Scholar
Kubiatko, M. (2017). Miskoncepcie: definície, diagnostika, eliminácia. Verbum. Search in Google Scholar
Kuchta, D., Held, Ľ., & Veselský, M. (2007). Zisťovanie úrovne formálneho myslenia vybraných študentov vysokých škôl pomocou IPDT testov. In M. Kuhnová, & J. Miklovičová (Eds.), Inovačné trendy v prírodovednom vzdelávaní (s. 65–67). Trnavská univerzita. Search in Google Scholar
Lapitková, V. (1997). Projekt FAST na Slovensku. In V. Lapitková (Ed.), Zborník z konferencie FAST – DISCO (s. 30–39). R&D Print. Search in Google Scholar
Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., & Demkanin, P. (2020). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 1 pre 6. ročník ZŠ a primu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., & Útla, J. (2021). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 1 pre 7. ročník ZŠ a sekundu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., Demkanin, P., Kolesár, J., & Malkin Ondík, I. (2022a). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 2 pre 6. ročník ZŠ a primu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., Útla, J., Held, Ľ., & Rošková, E. (2022b). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 2 pre 7. ročník ZŠ a sekundu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., Útla, J., Horváth, P., Nociarová, M., & Šromeková, K. (2022c). Fyzika 1 pre 8. ročník ZŠ a pre terciu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (1995). The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory into practice, 34(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543656 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Maňák, J., & Knecht, P. (2007). Hodnocení učebnic. PAIDO. Search in Google Scholar
Manninen, J., Burman, A., Koivunen, A., Kuittinen, E., Luukannel, S., Passi, S., & Särkkä, H. (2007). Environments supporting learning: Introduction to learning-environment-thinking. Finnish National Board of Education. Search in Google Scholar
Marušincová, E. (1997). Projekt FAST a vývin tvorivých schopností žiakov. In V. Lapitková (Ed.), Zborník z konferencie FAST – DISCO (s. 87–94). R&D Print. Search in Google Scholar
McCurren, C.A., & Ganong, L.H. (1984). Assessing cognitive functioning of the elderly with the inventory of Piaget’s developmental tasks’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9(5), 449–456. Search in Google Scholar
Milakofsky, L., & Patterson, H.O. (1979). Chemical education and Piaget: A new paper-pencil inventory to assess cognitive functionig. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(2), 87–90. Search in Google Scholar
Minner, D.D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Míkva, M. (2013). Didaktická rekonštrukcia pojmov z organickej chémie. [Dizertačná práca, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave]. Search in Google Scholar
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Narli, S. (2011). Is constructivist learning environment really effective on learning and long-term knowledge retention in mathematics? Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 36–49. Search in Google Scholar
Nelson Laird, T. F., Seifert, T.A., Pacarella, E.T., Mayhew, M. J., & Blaich, Ch. F. (2014). Deeply affecting first-year student’s thinking: deep approaches to learning and three dimensions od cognitive development. The Journal od Higher Education, 85(3), 402–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777333 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
OECD. (2019). Country note Slovak republic. Programme For International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018 CN SVK.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Orolínová, M., & Kotuľáková, K. (2014). Rozvoj spôsobilostí vedeckej práce v podmienkach kontinuálneho vzdelávania učiteľov. Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Search in Google Scholar
Othman, J., Treagust, D.F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2008). An investigation into the relationship between students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter and their understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1531–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701459897 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Patterson, H.O., & Milakofsky, L. (1980). A paper-and-pencil inventory for the assessment of Piaget’s tasks. Applied psychological measurement, 4(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014662168000400306 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L.A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E.T., Manoli, C.C., Zacharia, Z.C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
PISA. (2019). Národná správa PISA 2018. https://www2.nucem.sk/dl/4636/Narodna sprava PISA 2018.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Priškinová, N. (2021). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania a hodnotenie žiakov. [Dizertačná práca, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave]. Search in Google Scholar
Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001 1 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Radcliffe, D. (2008). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. In D. Radcliffe, W. Wilson, D. Powell, & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design (pp. 11–16). The University of Queensland. Search in Google Scholar
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henrikson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europa. Brussel, European Commisison (22 p.). https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/rapportrocardfinal.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Rybár, J. (1997). Úvod do epistemológie Jeana Piageta. Iris. Search in Google Scholar
Ryplová, R., & Reháková, J. (2011). Přínos badatelsky orientovaného vyučování (BOV) pro enviromentální výchovu: Případová studie implementace BOV do výuky na ZŠ. Envigogika, 6(3), 1–10. Search in Google Scholar
Samaresh, A. (2017). Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(22), 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3298 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Shibley, I.A., Milakofsky, L., Bender, D. S., & Patterson, H.O. (2003). College chemistry and Piaget: An analysis of gender difference, cognitive abilities, and achievement measures seventeen years apart. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(5), 569–573. Search in Google Scholar
Schubertová, R., & Chrenková, M. (2022). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia pre 6. ročník, pracovná učebnica 1. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Schubertová, R., Chrenková, M., & Slivková, E. (2022a). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia pre 6. ročník, pracovná učebnica 2. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Schubertová, R., Chrenková, M., Škodová, M., Tomčíková, I., & Gregorová, B. (2022b). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia a geografia 2 pre 5. ročník ZŠ. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Schubertová, R., Škodová, M., Chrenková, M., & Balážovič, Ľ. (2021). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia a geografia 1 pre 5. ročník ZŠ. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar
Škoda, J., & Doulík, P. (2010). Prekoncepce a miskoncepce v oborových didaktikách. Acta Universitatis Purkynianae. Search in Google Scholar
Škoda, J., & Doulík, P. (2011). Psychodidaktika. Metody efektivniěko a smysluplneěho učení a vyučování. Grada. Search in Google Scholar
ŠPÚ. (2014). Inovovaný štátny vzdelávací program pre predmet chémia. https://www.statpedu.sk/files/articles/dokumenty/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/chemia nsv 2014.pdf Search in Google Scholar
ŠPÚ. (2015). Inovovaný štátny vzdelávací program. Oblasť Človek a príroda. http://www.statpedu.sk/sk/svp/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/inovovany-svp-2.stupen-zs/clovek-priroda/ Search in Google Scholar
Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test do assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195–212. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533786.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Veselský, M. (2009). Úroveň myšlení studentů vysokých škol a jeho měření pomocí IPDT. Pedagogika, 59(1), 71–79. Search in Google Scholar
Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019). Science education textbook research trends: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S. (2014). Examining cognitive development from conceptual change point of view: The Framework theory approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.921153 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L. J., Bao, Q., Chen, L., & Liang, Y. (2021). Dynamic adaptation of the inventory of Piaget’s developmental tasks (IPDT) and the application for children with low socioeconomic status. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(9), 960–975. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00960 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L. J., Chen, L., & Fang, F.X. (2011). The adaptation of dynamic test using the inventory of Piaget’s developmental task (IPDT): An initial validation and application. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(9), 1075–1086. Search in Google Scholar

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

[1] Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[2] Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J.W., & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[3] Altbach, P. G. (1991). Introduction. In P.G. Altbach (Eds.), Textbooks in American Society (pp. 1–6). State University of New York Press. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Atkin, J. M., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5), 45–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24146536 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802 3 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bates, A.W. (2016). What is a learning environment?. In W.A. Bates (Ed.), Teaching in a digital age.Pressbooks. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/chapter/5-2-what-is-a-learning-environment/ Search in Google Scholar

[7] Benedikovičová, Z. (2013). Konštruktivistický prístup k vyučovaniu o chemickej väzbe v podmienkach základného vzdelávania. [Dizertačná práca, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave]. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bernard, P., Maciejowska, I., Krzeczkowska, M., & Odrow¸a˙z, E. (2015). Influence of in-service teacher training on their opinions about IBSE. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.343 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[9] Brianzoni, V., & Cardellini, L. (2015). Science education in Italy: Critical and desirable aspect of learning environments. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(5), 1648–3898. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.685 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[10] Broďáni, J. (2005). Effect size – veľkosť účinku ako prostriedok posúdenia významnosti rozdielov priemerov skupín. In K. Félix, P. Gles, & J. Kasa, Adaptácia v tréningovom procese: Elektronický zborník z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. STU Bratislava. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bybee, R.W., & Landes, N. M. (1990). Science for life and living: An elementary school science program for Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. The American Biology Teacher, 52(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449042 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[12] Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., van Scooter, P., Powell, J. C., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5e instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. BSCS. https://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs 5e executive summary.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[13] Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[14] Coleman, S. L., & Gotch, A. J. (1998). Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p206 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[15] Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O.E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In O. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, & C. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning. Contributions from science education research (vol. 5, pp. 1–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0 1 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[16] Čáp, J., & Mareš, J. (2001). Psychologie po učitele. Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Donnelly, D. F., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2014). ‘Just be quiet and listen to exactly what he’s saying’: Conceptualising power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2029–2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.889867 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[18] Dorman, J.P., Aldridge, J.M., & Fraser, B. J. (2006). Using students’ assessment of classroom environment to develop a typology of secondary school classrooms. International Education Journal, 7(7), 906–915. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Duran, L. B., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E Instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. The Science Education Review, 3(2), 49–58. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Fan, J., & Zhang, L. (2014). The role of learning environments in thinking styles. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.817538 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[21] Fraser, B. J. (1999). Using learning environment assessment to improve classroom and school climates. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 65–83). RoutledgeFalmer. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Furth, H. (1970). An inventory of Piaget’s developmental tasks. Center for Research in Thinking and Language. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Gokdere, M., & Calik, M. (2010). A cross-age study of Turkish students’ mental models: An atom concept. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 2, 185–199. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Grecmanová, H. (2008). Klima školy. Hanex. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Grecmanová, H., Urbanovská, E., Gonda, D., & Cabanová, V. (2020). Teachers didactic competencies when teaching natural science subject as s learning environment factor. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(12), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3678834 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[26] Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290609 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[27] Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Ashford Colour Press Ltd. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Harlen, W. (2015). Working with big ideas of science education. Science Education Programme (SEP) of IAP. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Härmälä-Braskén, A., Hemmi, K., & Kurtén, B. (2020). Misconceptions in chemistry among Finnish prospective primary school teachers – a long-term study. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1447–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1765046 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[30] Heikkila, A., Lonka, K., Nieminen, J., & Niemvirta, M. (2012). Relations between teacher students’ approaches to learning, cognitive and attributional strategies, well-being, and study success. Higher Education, 64, 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9504-9 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[31] Heinz, J., Enghag, M., Stuchlikova, I., Cakmakci, G., Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2016). Impact of initiatives to implement science inquiry: A comparative study of the Turkish, Israeli, Swedish and Czech science education systems. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12, 677–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9704-6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[32] Held, Ľ. (2014). Induktívno-deduktívna dimenzia prírodovedného vzdelávania. Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Held, Ľ., & Pupala, B. (1995). Psychogenéza žiakovho poznávania vo vyučovaní. PedF UK. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Held, Ľ., Bronerská, J., Čipková, E., Demkanin, P., Drozdíková, A., Fančovičová, J., Horváth, P., Hlavatá Hudáčková, N., Kotuľáková, K., Kováčová, L., Lapitková, V., Michalisková, R., Nagyová, S., Orolínová, M., Prokša, M., Ušáková, K., & Velmovská, K. (2019). Koncepcia prírodovedného kurikula pre základnú školu 2020. Veda. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Held, Ľ., Bronerská, J., Koperová, D., & Kotuľáková, K. (2021a). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Chémia pre 8. ročník ZŠ a pre terciu osemročných gymnázií. Pilotná verzia. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Held, Ľ., Bronerská, J., Kotuľáková, K., Kováčová, L., & Orolínová, M. (2021b). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Chémia pre 7. ročník ZŠ a pre sekundu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Held, Ľ., Žoldošová, K., Orolínová, M., Juricová, I., & Kotuľáková, K. (2011). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania (IBSE v slovenskom kontexte). Trnavská univerzita v Trnave. Indícia. (2021). Expedícia – skús, skúmaj, spoznaj. https://www.indicia.sk/aktualne-skolenia/expedicia?start=6 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Jelemenská, P., Sander, E., & Kattmann, U. (2003). Model didaktickej rekonštrukcie. Impulz pre výskum v odborových didaktikách. Pedagogika, 53(2), 190–201. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Knecht, P. (2007). Didaktická transformace aneb od „didaktického zjednodušení" k „didaktické rekonstrukci". Orbis scholae, 2(1), 67–81. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Kollárik, K. (1997). Projekt FAST a kognitívny vývin žiakov 8-ročných gymnázií. In V. Lapitková (Ed.), Zborník z konferencie FAST – DISCO (s. 95–100). R&D Print. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Koperová, D., & Held, Ľ. (2021a). Didaktická rekonštrucia témy atóm a jeho štruktúra. In V. Machková (Ed.), 16. Medzinárodní seminář doktorandů didaktiky chemie a příbuzných doktorských programů (s. 21–27). Univerzita Hradec Králové. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Koperová, D., & Held, Ľ. (2021b). K validizácii výrokovej škály pri skúmaní miskoncepcií v oblasti poznatkov o stavbe atómu. In V. Švandová, J. Literák, & B. Pelánková (Eds.), Sborník konference didaktiky přírodních věd DidSci+ 2021 (s. 49–59). MUNI PRESS. https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9876-2021-6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[43] Koperová, D., Held, Ľ., & Kotuľáková, K. (2020). Analysis of the atom and its structure in chemistry textbooks. In M. Rusek, M. Tóthová, & K. Vojíř (Eds.), Project-based education and other activating strategies in science education, XVII. (pp. 79–87). Charles University, Faculty of Education. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Kotuľáková, K. (2020). Výučba chémie ako ExpEdícia. Biológia, ekológia, chémia, 24(4), 21–21. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Kubiatko, M. (2017). Miskoncepcie: definície, diagnostika, eliminácia. Verbum. Search in Google Scholar

[46] Kuchta, D., Held, Ľ., & Veselský, M. (2007). Zisťovanie úrovne formálneho myslenia vybraných študentov vysokých škôl pomocou IPDT testov. In M. Kuhnová, & J. Miklovičová (Eds.), Inovačné trendy v prírodovednom vzdelávaní (s. 65–67). Trnavská univerzita. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Lapitková, V. (1997). Projekt FAST na Slovensku. In V. Lapitková (Ed.), Zborník z konferencie FAST – DISCO (s. 30–39). R&D Print. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., & Demkanin, P. (2020). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 1 pre 6. ročník ZŠ a primu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., & Útla, J. (2021). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 1 pre 7. ročník ZŠ a sekundu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[50] Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., Demkanin, P., Kolesár, J., & Malkin Ondík, I. (2022a). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 2 pre 6. ročník ZŠ a primu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[51] Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., Útla, J., Held, Ľ., & Rošková, E. (2022b). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Fyzika 2 pre 7. ročník ZŠ a sekundu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[52] Lapitková, V., Tóthová, R., Útla, J., Horváth, P., Nociarová, M., & Šromeková, K. (2022c). Fyzika 1 pre 8. ročník ZŠ a pre terciu osemročných gymnázií. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[53] Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[54] Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (1995). The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory into practice, 34(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543656 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[55] Maňák, J., & Knecht, P. (2007). Hodnocení učebnic. PAIDO. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Manninen, J., Burman, A., Koivunen, A., Kuittinen, E., Luukannel, S., Passi, S., & Särkkä, H. (2007). Environments supporting learning: Introduction to learning-environment-thinking. Finnish National Board of Education. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Marušincová, E. (1997). Projekt FAST a vývin tvorivých schopností žiakov. In V. Lapitková (Ed.), Zborník z konferencie FAST – DISCO (s. 87–94). R&D Print. Search in Google Scholar

[58] McCurren, C.A., & Ganong, L.H. (1984). Assessing cognitive functioning of the elderly with the inventory of Piaget’s developmental tasks’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9(5), 449–456. Search in Google Scholar

[59] Milakofsky, L., & Patterson, H.O. (1979). Chemical education and Piaget: A new paper-pencil inventory to assess cognitive functionig. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(2), 87–90. Search in Google Scholar

[60] Minner, D.D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[61] Míkva, M. (2013). Didaktická rekonštrukcia pojmov z organickej chémie. [Dizertačná práca, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave]. Search in Google Scholar

[62] Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[63] Narli, S. (2011). Is constructivist learning environment really effective on learning and long-term knowledge retention in mathematics? Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 36–49. Search in Google Scholar

[64] Nelson Laird, T. F., Seifert, T.A., Pacarella, E.T., Mayhew, M. J., & Blaich, Ch. F. (2014). Deeply affecting first-year student’s thinking: deep approaches to learning and three dimensions od cognitive development. The Journal od Higher Education, 85(3), 402–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777333 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[65] OECD. (2019). Country note Slovak republic. Programme For International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018 CN SVK.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[66] Orolínová, M., & Kotuľáková, K. (2014). Rozvoj spôsobilostí vedeckej práce v podmienkach kontinuálneho vzdelávania učiteľov. Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Search in Google Scholar

[67] Othman, J., Treagust, D.F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2008). An investigation into the relationship between students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter and their understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1531–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701459897 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[68] Patterson, H.O., & Milakofsky, L. (1980). A paper-and-pencil inventory for the assessment of Piaget’s tasks. Applied psychological measurement, 4(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014662168000400306 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[69] Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L.A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E.T., Manoli, C.C., Zacharia, Z.C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[70] PISA. (2019). Národná správa PISA 2018. https://www2.nucem.sk/dl/4636/Narodna sprava PISA 2018.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[71] Priškinová, N. (2021). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania a hodnotenie žiakov. [Dizertačná práca, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave]. Search in Google Scholar

[72] Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001 1 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[73] Radcliffe, D. (2008). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. In D. Radcliffe, W. Wilson, D. Powell, & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design (pp. 11–16). The University of Queensland. Search in Google Scholar

[74] Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henrikson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europa. Brussel, European Commisison (22 p.). https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/rapportrocardfinal.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[75] Rybár, J. (1997). Úvod do epistemológie Jeana Piageta. Iris. Search in Google Scholar

[76] Ryplová, R., & Reháková, J. (2011). Přínos badatelsky orientovaného vyučování (BOV) pro enviromentální výchovu: Případová studie implementace BOV do výuky na ZŠ. Envigogika, 6(3), 1–10. Search in Google Scholar

[77] Samaresh, A. (2017). Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(22), 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3298 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[78] Shibley, I.A., Milakofsky, L., Bender, D. S., & Patterson, H.O. (2003). College chemistry and Piaget: An analysis of gender difference, cognitive abilities, and achievement measures seventeen years apart. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(5), 569–573. Search in Google Scholar

[79] Schubertová, R., & Chrenková, M. (2022). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia pre 6. ročník, pracovná učebnica 1. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[80] Schubertová, R., Chrenková, M., & Slivková, E. (2022a). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia pre 6. ročník, pracovná učebnica 2. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[81] Schubertová, R., Chrenková, M., Škodová, M., Tomčíková, I., & Gregorová, B. (2022b). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia a geografia 2 pre 5. ročník ZŠ. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[82] Schubertová, R., Škodová, M., Chrenková, M., & Balážovič, Ľ. (2021). ExpEdícia skús, skúmaj, spoznaj – Biológia a geografia 1 pre 5. ročník ZŠ. Indícia. Search in Google Scholar

[83] Škoda, J., & Doulík, P. (2010). Prekoncepce a miskoncepce v oborových didaktikách. Acta Universitatis Purkynianae. Search in Google Scholar

[84] Škoda, J., & Doulík, P. (2011). Psychodidaktika. Metody efektivniěko a smysluplneěho učení a vyučování. Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[85] ŠPÚ. (2014). Inovovaný štátny vzdelávací program pre predmet chémia. https://www.statpedu.sk/files/articles/dokumenty/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/chemia nsv 2014.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[86] ŠPÚ. (2015). Inovovaný štátny vzdelávací program. Oblasť Človek a príroda. http://www.statpedu.sk/sk/svp/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/inovovany-svp-2.stupen-zs/clovek-priroda/ Search in Google Scholar

[87] Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test do assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[88] Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195–212. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533786.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[89] Veselský, M. (2009). Úroveň myšlení studentů vysokých škol a jeho měření pomocí IPDT. Pedagogika, 59(1), 71–79. Search in Google Scholar

[90] Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019). Science education textbook research trends: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[91] Vosniadou, S. (2014). Examining cognitive development from conceptual change point of view: The Framework theory approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.921153 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[92] Zhang, L. J., Bao, Q., Chen, L., & Liang, Y. (2021). Dynamic adaptation of the inventory of Piaget’s developmental tasks (IPDT) and the application for children with low socioeconomic status. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(9), 960–975. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00960 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[93] Zhang, L. J., Chen, L., & Fang, F.X. (2011). The adaptation of dynamic test using the inventory of Piaget’s developmental task (IPDT): An initial validation and application. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(9), 1075–1086. Search in Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Abstract

References

Downloads

License