Možnosti využití Likertovy škály – základní principy aplikace v pedagogickém výzkumu a demonstrace na příkladu zjišťování vztahu člověka k přírodě

Vlastimil Chytrý; Roman Kroufek

doi:10.14712/18047106.591

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): sciED Theoretical Studies

Possibilities of Using the Likert’s Scale — Basic Principles of Application in Pedagogical Research and Demonstration on the Example of Human Relationship to Nature

Vlastimil Chytrý, ¹ Roman Kroufek, ¹

Univerzita J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.591

PDF (Czech)

How to Cite

Chytrý, V., & Kroufek, R. (2017). Possibilities of Using the Likert’s Scale — Basic Principles of Application in Pedagogical Research and Demonstration on the Example of Human Relationship to Nature. Scientia in Educatione, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.591

Download Citation

Abstract

This article is focused on the possibilities in data processing based on the Likert scale. The article outlines the principles guiding the use of data suitable for this particular scale analysis, and then demonstrates how to work with such data sets. The test uses data generated by Nature relatedness scale which is commonly used for analysing the
relationship between test subjects and nature with the use of a quantitative method. The main goal of the article is to describe possible ways how to process and analyze such data through the Likert scale survey. In doing so, it also substantiates the procedure of the data processing with reference to empirical data which provide information about man-nature relationship.

References

Albaum, G. (1997). The Likert scale revisited: An alternate version. Journal of the Market Research Society, 39, 331–349. Search in Google Scholar
Allen, E. & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40, 64–65. Search in Google Scholar
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Sorensen, C. (2010).Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). California: Thomson Wadsworth. Search in Google Scholar
Baggaley, A. & Hull, A. (1983). The effect of nonlinear transformations on a Likert scale. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 6, 483–491. Search in Google Scholar
Barnett, V. & Lewis, T. (1978). Outliers in statistical data. New York: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar
Ben-Gal, I. (2005). Outlier detection. In O. Maimon & L. Rockach (Eds.), Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook: A complete guide for practitioners and researchers Search in Google Scholar
(131–146). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Search in Google Scholar
Bendl, S. (2011). Školní kázeň v teorii a praxi: učebnice pro studenty učitelství. Praha: Triton. Search in Google Scholar
Blahuš, P. (2000). Statistická významnost proti vědecké průkaznosti výsledků výzkumu. Česká kinantropologie, 4(2), 53–72. Search in Google Scholar
Boone, H. N. & Boone, D.A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1–5. Search in Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement? SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(1), 10–14. Search in Google Scholar
Carifio, J. & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about likert scales and likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106–116. Search in Google Scholar
Clason, D. L. & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), 31–35. Search in Google Scholar
Craig, J. M., Logan, A.C. & Prescott, S. L. (2016). Natural environments, nature relatedness and the ecological theater: connecting satellites and sequencing to shinrin-yoku. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 35(1). Search in Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. Search in Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. Search in Google Scholar
De Winter, J.C.F. & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(11). Dostupné z http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=11 Search in Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G. & Jones, R.E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: a revised NEP scale. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. Search in Google Scholar
Franěk, M. (2012). Nature Relatedness Scale. Český překlad škály měřící spojení s přírodou. Envigogika, 7(1). Search in Google Scholar
Dostupné z https://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/69/73 Search in Google Scholar
Gadermann, A.M., Guhn, M. & Zumbo, B.D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3). Search in Google Scholar
Dostupné z http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=3 Search in Google Scholar
Garrido, L.E., Abad, J. J. & Ponsoda, V. (2013). A new look at Horn’s parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 454–474. Search in Google Scholar
Gavora, P. (2010). Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu. Brno: Paido. Search in Google Scholar
Gavora, P. (2013). Validita a reliabilita výskumných nástrojov: princípy a reálna prax. Pedagogická orientace, 23(4), 511–534. Search in Google Scholar
Hebák, P. (2013). Statistické myšlení a nástroje analýzy dat. Praha: Informatorium. Search in Google Scholar
Hendl, J. (2012). Přehled statistických metod. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Hodge, D. R. & Gillespie, D. (2003). Phrase completions: An alternative to likert scales. Social Work Research, 27, 45–55. Search in Google Scholar
Chráska, M. (2016). Metody pedagogického výzkumu: základy kvantitativního výzkumu. 2. aktualizované vydání. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar
Jakobsson, U. (2004). Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18, 437–440. Search in Google Scholar
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212–1218. Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, B. & Manoli, C.C. (2008). Using Bogner and Wiseman’s Model of Ecological Values to measure the impact of an earth education programme on children’s environmental perceptions. Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 115–127. Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, R. & Penny, J. (2005). Split-Half Reliability. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (649–654). Elsveir. Search in Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S. & Pal, D.K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. Search in Google Scholar
Kellert, S. & Wilson, E.O. (Eds.). (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: Shearwater Books. Search in Google Scholar
Kerlinger, F. N. (1972). Základy výzkumu chování: pedagogický a psychologický výzkum. Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar
Koníček, L., Malčík, M., Maťašeje, H. & Mazurová, V. (2007). Hodnocení výsledků vzdělávání – praktická část. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě. Search in Google Scholar
Kroufek, R., Janovec, J. & Chytrý, V. (2015). Pre-service primary teachers and their attitudes towards nature. In O. Fleischmann, R. Seebauer, H. Zoglowek & M. Aleksandrovich (Eds.), The Teaching profession: New Challneges — New Search in Google Scholar
Identities. Wien: Lit Verlag GmbH & Co. KG. Search in Google Scholar
Kroufek, R. (2016). Environmentální gramotnost studentů Učitelství pro 1. stupeň základní školy a možnosti jejího zjišťování [Disertační práce]. Dostupné z http://theses.cz/id/i5rowz/Kroufek Roman disertace.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Kubiatko, M. (2016). Bol Likert ordinalista alebo intervalista? Chyby při tvorbe a vyhodnocovaní Likertových škál. Pedagogika.sk, 7(3), 177–190. Search in Google Scholar
Kuzon, W. M., Urbanchek, M.G. & McCabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37, 265–272. Search in Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 22, 5–55. Search in Google Scholar
Madansky, A. (1988). Prescriptions for Working Statisticians. New York, Springer. Search in Google Scholar
Martinková, P. & Vlčková, K. (2014). Hodnocení reliability znalostních a psychologických testů. Informační bulletin České statistické společnosti, 4, 1–15. Search in Google Scholar
Martyn, P. & Brymer, E. (2014). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(7), 1436–1445. Search in Google Scholar
Maurer, J. & Pierce, H.R. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 324–329. Search in Google Scholar
Mazalová, L. & Marečková, J. (2012). Types of Validity in the Research of NANDA International Components. Profese on-line, 5(1), 11–15. Dostupné z http://profeseonline.upol.cz/en/pdfs/pol/2012/02/03.pdf Search in Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: “domain validity and generalizability”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 75–79. Search in Google Scholar
McLeod, S.A. (2008). Likert scale. Dostupné z http://www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html Search in Google Scholar
Meloun, M. & Militký, J. (2002). Kompendium statistického zpracování dat: metody a řešené úlohy. Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar
Nisbet, E.K. (2011). A nature relatedness intervention to promote happiness and environmental concern [Disertační práce]. Ottawa: Carleton University. Search in Google Scholar
Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M. & Murphy, S.A. (2009). The Nature relatedness scale. Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. Search in Google Scholar
Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M. & Murphy, S.A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. Search in Google Scholar
Nisbet, E.K. & Zelenski, J.M. (2013). The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–11. Search in Google Scholar
Novick, M.R. & Lewis, C. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32(1), 1–13. Search in Google Scholar
Nun-Nally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Search in Google Scholar
Parker, L. & Lunney, M. (1998). Moving beyond content validation of nursing diagnoses. Nursing Diagnosis, 9(4), 144–150. Search in Google Scholar
Pavlasová, L. (2015). Disertační práce se zaměřením na didaktiku biologie, geologie a ekologie v České republice v letech 2004–2013. Scientia in educatione, 6(2), 4–15. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/234 Search in Google Scholar
Pelikán, J. (2011). Základy empirického výzkumu pedagogických jevů. Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar
Pell, G. (2005). Uses and misuses of Likert scales. Medical Education, 39(9), 970. Search in Google Scholar
Polit, D.F. & Beck, T.C. (2008). Nursing Research. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co. Search in Google Scholar
Půlpán, Z. (2004). K problematice zpracování empirických šetření v humanitních vědách. Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar
Revelle, W. & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, M.W. & Kuder, G. F. (1939). The calculation of test reliability coefficients based upon the method of rational equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(9), 681–687. Search in Google Scholar
Rod, A. (2012). Likertovo škálování. E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy, 13, 2–14. Dostupné z http://nb.vse.cz/kfil/elogos/science/rod12.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Rusek, M. (2015). Analýza disertačních prací z didaktiky chemie obájených v České republice v letech 2003–2014. Scientia in educatione, 6(2), 16–34. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/233 Search in Google Scholar
Říčan, J. & Pešout, O. (2013, 16.–18. 9.). Výzkum kalibrace: nové perspektivy vědního objevování v pedagogické psychologii. In Sborník kol. autorů (Eds.), Efektivita vzdělávání v proměnách společnosti (311–317). Ústí nad Labem: PF UJEP. Search in Google Scholar
Sachs, L. (1984). Applied Statistics, A Handbook of Techniques. New York: Springer. Search in Google Scholar
Saricam, H., Sahín, S.H. & Soyucok, E. (2015). Dogayla iliskili olma ile dpresyon, anksiyete ve stres arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi. Internation Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Researches, 4, 38–57. Search in Google Scholar
Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methodsfor business:A skill building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. S.& Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–601. Search in Google Scholar
Shoukri, M.M. & Edge, V. L. (1996). Statistical methods for health sciences. Michigan University: CRC Press. Search in Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1959). Measurement, Psychophysics and Utility. In C.W. Churchman & P. Ratoosh (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and Theories (18–63). New York: John Wiley. Search in Google Scholar
Subedi, B. P. (2016). Using Likert type data in social science research: Confusion, issues and challenges. International Journal of Conterporary Applied Sciences, 3(2), 36–49. Search in Google Scholar
Šmejkal, P., Skoršepa, M., Stratilová Urválková, E. & Teplý, P. (2016). Chemické úlohy se školními měřícími systémy: motivační orientace žáků v badatelsky orientovaných úlohách. Scientia in educatione, 7(1), 29–48. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/280 Search in Google Scholar
Vácha, Z. & Ditrich, T. (2016). Efektivita badatelsky orientovaného vyučování na primárním stupni základních škol v přírodovědném vzdělávání v České republice s využitím prostředí školních zahrad. Scientia in educatione, 7(1), 65–79. Search in Google Scholar
Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/293 Search in Google Scholar
Vickers, A. (1999). Comparison of an ordinal and a continuous outcome measure of muscle soreness. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15, 709–716. Search in Google Scholar
Weng, L. & Cheng, C.P. (2000). Effects of response order on Likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 908–924. Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Zvára, K. (2002) Měření reliability aneb bacha na Cronbacha, Informační bulletin České statistické společnosti, 13(2), 13–20. Search in Google Scholar
Žák, V. (2015). Disertační práce z didaktiky fyziky obhájené v České republice v letech 2004 až 2013 – přehled a analýza. Scientia in educatione, 6(2), 35–50. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/235 Search in Google Scholar
Žák, V. (2016). Metody sběru dat využívané didaktikou fyziky v mezinárodním prostředí. Scientia in educatione, 7(2), 18–33. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/349 Search in Google Scholar

Downloads

10

THE INFLUENCE OF EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES ON THE INTEREST OF CZECH AND FINNISH STUDENTS IN BIOLOGYIna Rajsiglová, Viktorie Poneszová, Milada TepláJournal of Baltic Science Education, ISSN 1648-3898, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 536, year 2024https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.536
Kvalita života osob pečujících a osob se zdravotním postiženímJan MichalíkISBN 978-80-244-5471-9, year 2018https://doi.org/10.5507/pdf.18.24454719
Comparative Analysis of the Quality of Visuals in Geography Textbooks for ISCED 1 and ISCED 2 Levels of EducationPetr Trahorsch, Jan D. Bláha, Vlastimil ChytrýReview of International Geographical Education Online, ISSN 2146-0353, year 2019https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.509255
ADOPTION OF ICT INNOVATIONS BY SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS AND PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS WITHIN CHEMISTRY EDUCATIONMartin Rusek, Dagmar Stárková, Vlastimil Chytrý, Martin BílekJournal of Baltic Science Education, ISSN 1648-3898, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 510, year 2017https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.510
The impact of reduced time spent outdoors during the Covid-19 lockdown on the health and well-being of young people in CzechiaDominik Rubáš, Tomáš Matějček, Roman KroufekAUC GEOGRAPHICA, ISSN 0300-5402, vol. 57, no. 2, p. 109, year 2022https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2022.9
Outdoor education during the Covid-19 crisis: an analysis of the situation in the Czech RepublicRoman Kroufek, Vlastimil Chytrý, Karel Nepraš, Ladislava Filipová, Jan MusilEduPort, ISSN 26950936, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 69, year 2022https://doi.org/10.21062/edp.2022.006
THE EFFECT OF LOWER-SECONDARY CHEMISTRY EDUCATION: STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING TO THE NATURE OF CHEMISTRY AND THEIR ATTITUDESMartin Rusek, Vlastimil Chytrý, Linda HonskusováJournal of Baltic Science Education, ISSN 1648-3898, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 286, year 2019https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.286
Applying AI Ethics Tools in Mining Industry OrganizationsTatiana MASÁROVÁActa Montanistica Slovaca, ISSN 1335-1788, year 2025https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v30i3.04
The Influence of Teacher's Competences on Pupils' Attitudes towards People with DisabilitiesLadislav Zilcher, Vlastimil Chytrý, Barbora LankováOnline Journal of Primary and Preschool Education, ISSN 2533-7106, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 37, year 2019https://doi.org/10.21062/ujep/330.2019/a/2533-7106/OJPPE/2019/3/37
DIFFERENCES IN CHEMISTRY TEACHERS’ ACCEPTANCE OF EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE ACCORDING TO THEIR USER TYPE: AN APPLICATION OF EXTENDED UTAUT MODELKateřina Chroustová, Andrej Šorgo, Martin Bílek, Martin RusekJournal of Baltic Science Education, ISSN 1648-3898, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 762, year 2022https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.762

0

18

19

Find citations

Download data is not yet available.

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

[1] Albaum, G. (1997). The Likert scale revisited: An alternate version. Journal of the Market Research Society, 39, 331–349. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Allen, E. & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40, 64–65. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Sorensen, C. (2010).Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). California: Thomson Wadsworth. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Baggaley, A. & Hull, A. (1983). The effect of nonlinear transformations on a Likert scale. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 6, 483–491. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Barnett, V. & Lewis, T. (1978). Outliers in statistical data. New York: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ben-Gal, I. (2005). Outlier detection. In O. Maimon & L. Rockach (Eds.), Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook: A complete guide for practitioners and researchers Search in Google Scholar

[7] (131–146). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bendl, S. (2011). Školní kázeň v teorii a praxi: učebnice pro studenty učitelství. Praha: Triton. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Blahuš, P. (2000). Statistická významnost proti vědecké průkaznosti výsledků výzkumu. Česká kinantropologie, 4(2), 53–72. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Boone, H. N. & Boone, D.A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1–5. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement? SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(1), 10–14. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Carifio, J. & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about likert scales and likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106–116. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Clason, D. L. & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), 31–35. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Craig, J. M., Logan, A.C. & Prescott, S. L. (2016). Natural environments, nature relatedness and the ecological theater: connecting satellites and sequencing to shinrin-yoku. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 35(1). Search in Google Scholar

[16] Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. Search in Google Scholar

[18] De Winter, J.C.F. & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(11). Dostupné z http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=11 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G. & Jones, R.E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: a revised NEP scale. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Franěk, M. (2012). Nature Relatedness Scale. Český překlad škály měřící spojení s přírodou. Envigogika, 7(1). Search in Google Scholar

[21] Dostupné z https://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/69/73 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Gadermann, A.M., Guhn, M. & Zumbo, B.D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3). Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dostupné z http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=3 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Garrido, L.E., Abad, J. J. & Ponsoda, V. (2013). A new look at Horn’s parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 454–474. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Gavora, P. (2010). Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu. Brno: Paido. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gavora, P. (2013). Validita a reliabilita výskumných nástrojov: princípy a reálna prax. Pedagogická orientace, 23(4), 511–534. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Hebák, P. (2013). Statistické myšlení a nástroje analýzy dat. Praha: Informatorium. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hendl, J. (2012). Přehled statistických metod. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Hodge, D. R. & Gillespie, D. (2003). Phrase completions: An alternative to likert scales. Social Work Research, 27, 45–55. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Chráska, M. (2016). Metody pedagogického výzkumu: základy kvantitativního výzkumu. 2. aktualizované vydání. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Jakobsson, U. (2004). Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18, 437–440. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212–1218. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Johnson, B. & Manoli, C.C. (2008). Using Bogner and Wiseman’s Model of Ecological Values to measure the impact of an earth education programme on children’s environmental perceptions. Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 115–127. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Johnson, R. & Penny, J. (2005). Split-Half Reliability. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (649–654). Elsveir. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S. & Pal, D.K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Kellert, S. & Wilson, E.O. (Eds.). (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: Shearwater Books. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Kerlinger, F. N. (1972). Základy výzkumu chování: pedagogický a psychologický výzkum. Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Koníček, L., Malčík, M., Maťašeje, H. & Mazurová, V. (2007). Hodnocení výsledků vzdělávání – praktická část. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Kroufek, R., Janovec, J. & Chytrý, V. (2015). Pre-service primary teachers and their attitudes towards nature. In O. Fleischmann, R. Seebauer, H. Zoglowek & M. Aleksandrovich (Eds.), The Teaching profession: New Challneges — New Search in Google Scholar

[40] Identities. Wien: Lit Verlag GmbH & Co. KG. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Kroufek, R. (2016). Environmentální gramotnost studentů Učitelství pro 1. stupeň základní školy a možnosti jejího zjišťování [Disertační práce]. Dostupné z http://theses.cz/id/i5rowz/Kroufek Roman disertace.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[42] Kubiatko, M. (2016). Bol Likert ordinalista alebo intervalista? Chyby při tvorbe a vyhodnocovaní Likertových škál. Pedagogika.sk, 7(3), 177–190. Search in Google Scholar

[43] Kuzon, W. M., Urbanchek, M.G. & McCabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37, 265–272. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 22, 5–55. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Madansky, A. (1988). Prescriptions for Working Statisticians. New York, Springer. Search in Google Scholar

[46] Martinková, P. & Vlčková, K. (2014). Hodnocení reliability znalostních a psychologických testů. Informační bulletin České statistické společnosti, 4, 1–15. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Martyn, P. & Brymer, E. (2014). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(7), 1436–1445. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Maurer, J. & Pierce, H.R. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 324–329. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Mazalová, L. & Marečková, J. (2012). Types of Validity in the Research of NANDA International Components. Profese on-line, 5(1), 11–15. Dostupné z http://profeseonline.upol.cz/en/pdfs/pol/2012/02/03.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[50] McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: “domain validity and generalizability”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 75–79. Search in Google Scholar

[51] McLeod, S.A. (2008). Likert scale. Dostupné z http://www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html Search in Google Scholar

[52] Meloun, M. & Militký, J. (2002). Kompendium statistického zpracování dat: metody a řešené úlohy. Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar

[53] Nisbet, E.K. (2011). A nature relatedness intervention to promote happiness and environmental concern [Disertační práce]. Ottawa: Carleton University. Search in Google Scholar

[54] Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M. & Murphy, S.A. (2009). The Nature relatedness scale. Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. Search in Google Scholar

[55] Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M. & Murphy, S.A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Nisbet, E.K. & Zelenski, J.M. (2013). The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–11. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Novick, M.R. & Lewis, C. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32(1), 1–13. Search in Google Scholar

[58] Nun-Nally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Search in Google Scholar

[59] Parker, L. & Lunney, M. (1998). Moving beyond content validation of nursing diagnoses. Nursing Diagnosis, 9(4), 144–150. Search in Google Scholar

[60] Pavlasová, L. (2015). Disertační práce se zaměřením na didaktiku biologie, geologie a ekologie v České republice v letech 2004–2013. Scientia in educatione, 6(2), 4–15. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/234 Search in Google Scholar

[61] Pelikán, J. (2011). Základy empirického výzkumu pedagogických jevů. Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar

[62] Pell, G. (2005). Uses and misuses of Likert scales. Medical Education, 39(9), 970. Search in Google Scholar

[63] Polit, D.F. & Beck, T.C. (2008). Nursing Research. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co. Search in Google Scholar

[64] Půlpán, Z. (2004). K problematice zpracování empirických šetření v humanitních vědách. Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar

[65] Revelle, W. & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. Search in Google Scholar

[66] Richardson, M.W. & Kuder, G. F. (1939). The calculation of test reliability coefficients based upon the method of rational equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(9), 681–687. Search in Google Scholar

[67] Rod, A. (2012). Likertovo škálování. E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy, 13, 2–14. Dostupné z http://nb.vse.cz/kfil/elogos/science/rod12.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[68] Rusek, M. (2015). Analýza disertačních prací z didaktiky chemie obájených v České republice v letech 2003–2014. Scientia in educatione, 6(2), 16–34. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/233 Search in Google Scholar

[69] Říčan, J. & Pešout, O. (2013, 16.–18. 9.). Výzkum kalibrace: nové perspektivy vědního objevování v pedagogické psychologii. In Sborník kol. autorů (Eds.), Efektivita vzdělávání v proměnách společnosti (311–317). Ústí nad Labem: PF UJEP. Search in Google Scholar

[70] Sachs, L. (1984). Applied Statistics, A Handbook of Techniques. New York: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

[71] Saricam, H., Sahín, S.H. & Soyucok, E. (2015). Dogayla iliskili olma ile dpresyon, anksiyete ve stres arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi. Internation Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Researches, 4, 38–57. Search in Google Scholar

[72] Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methodsfor business:A skill building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

[73] Shapiro, S. S.& Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–601. Search in Google Scholar

[74] Shoukri, M.M. & Edge, V. L. (1996). Statistical methods for health sciences. Michigan University: CRC Press. Search in Google Scholar

[75] Stevens, S. S. (1959). Measurement, Psychophysics and Utility. In C.W. Churchman & P. Ratoosh (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and Theories (18–63). New York: John Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

[76] Subedi, B. P. (2016). Using Likert type data in social science research: Confusion, issues and challenges. International Journal of Conterporary Applied Sciences, 3(2), 36–49. Search in Google Scholar

[77] Šmejkal, P., Skoršepa, M., Stratilová Urválková, E. & Teplý, P. (2016). Chemické úlohy se školními měřícími systémy: motivační orientace žáků v badatelsky orientovaných úlohách. Scientia in educatione, 7(1), 29–48. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/280 Search in Google Scholar

[78] Vácha, Z. & Ditrich, T. (2016). Efektivita badatelsky orientovaného vyučování na primárním stupni základních škol v přírodovědném vzdělávání v České republice s využitím prostředí školních zahrad. Scientia in educatione, 7(1), 65–79. Search in Google Scholar

[79] Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/293 Search in Google Scholar

[80] Vickers, A. (1999). Comparison of an ordinal and a continuous outcome measure of muscle soreness. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15, 709–716. Search in Google Scholar

[81] Weng, L. & Cheng, C.P. (2000). Effects of response order on Likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 908–924. Search in Google Scholar

[82] Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[83] Zvára, K. (2002) Měření reliability aneb bacha na Cronbacha, Informační bulletin České statistické společnosti, 13(2), 13–20. Search in Google Scholar

[84] Žák, V. (2015). Disertační práce z didaktiky fyziky obhájené v České republice v letech 2004 až 2013 – přehled a analýza. Scientia in educatione, 6(2), 35–50. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/235 Search in Google Scholar

[85] Žák, V. (2016). Metody sběru dat využívané didaktikou fyziky v mezinárodním prostředí. Scientia in educatione, 7(2), 18–33. Dostupné z http://www.scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/349 Search in Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Abstract

References

Downloads

License