História induktívneho prístupu v prírodovednom vzdelávaní v USA a jeho súčasná reflexia na Slovensku

Michaela Minárechová

doi:10.14712/18047106.94

Vol 5 No 1 (2014): sciED Teoretické studie

História induktívneho prístupu v prírodovednom vzdelávaní v USA a jeho súčasná reflexia na Slovensku

Michaela Minárechová, ¹

Katedra školskej pedagogiky Pedagogickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity Priemyselná 4, 918 43 Trnava, Slovensko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.94

PDF

Jak citovat

Minárechová, M. (2020). História induktívneho prístupu v prírodovednom vzdelávaní v USA a jeho súčasná reflexia na Slovensku. Scientia in educatione, 5(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.94

Stánhout citace

Abstrakt

V súčasnej dobe má v prírodovednom vzdelávaní veľké zastúpenie induktívny spôsob vyučovania a učenia sa, pod ktorý spadá aj na Slovensku čoraz viac známa výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania (Inquiry-Based Science Education, IBSE). V príspevku sa snažíme priblížiť a objasniť vznik a vývoj výskumne ladenej koncepcie prírodovedného vzdelávania; od objasnenia pojmu bádanie, jeho podoby v historickom kontexte, postupné začleňovanie do kurikulárnych dokumentov až po jeho súčasnú podobu. Zameriavame sa na americkú históriu prírodovedného vzdelávania, pretože práve v tomto prostredí nachádzame prvé zmienky o bádaní ako vyučovacej metóde.

Reference

Abd”El”Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok”Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., ... & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Afra, N. Ch., Osta, I., Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students Alternative Conceptions about Electricity and Effect of Inquiry-Based Teaching Strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103-132. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Akgul, E.,M. (2006). Teaching science in an inquiry-based learning environment: What it means for pre-service elementary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1),71–81. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Jardine, L., Silverthorne, M. (eds.). (2000). Bacon, Francis. The New Organon. New York: Cambridge University Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Banchi, H., Bell, R. (2008). The Many Levels of Inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29 Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Barrow, L.,H. (2006). A Brief History of Inquiry: From Dewey to Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Blanpied, W. A., Atkinson, R. C. Social Scientists’ Contributions to Science Policy during the New Deal. Dostupné z http://rca.ucsd.edu/speeches/Social_Science_and_Science_Policy.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Bybee, R.W. (1997). The Sputnik Era: Why Is This Educational Reform Different From All Other Reforms? A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/bybee1.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Chiappetta, E., L. (1997). Inquiry-Based Science Strategies and techniques for encouraging inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, 64(7), 22-26. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
DeBoer, G., E. (1997). What we have learned and where we are headed lessons from the Sputnik era. A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/deboer.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Dow, P. (1997). Sputnik revisited: Historical perspectives on science reform. A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/dow2.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Gentry, J. W. (1990). What is experiential learning? In J. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaining and experiential learning (9-20). East Brunswick, CN: Nichols/GP Publishing. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Haury, D.,L. (1993). Teaching Science through Inquiry. ERIC/CSMEE Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education Columbus OH. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Held, Ľ. a kol. (2011). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania. Trnava: Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Hovey, A., Hazelwood, C., Svedkauskaite, A (2005). Critical Issue: Science Education in the Era of No Child Left Behind—History, Benchmarks, and Standards. Dostupné z http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/sc600.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Chambers, C. (2002). Multi-Curricular Inquiry-Based Learning. City College of the City University of New York: condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/.../carlchambers.researchpaper.doc Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Kim, M., Chin, Ch. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ views on practical work with inquiry orientation in textbook-oriented science classrooms. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(1), 23-37. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Learning Point Associates. (2005). Using Student Engagement to Improve Adolescent Literacy. NCREL Quick Key Action Guide, 4. Dostupné z http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/qkey4.pdf. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Macmillan a McGraw-Hill, (2005). The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Science Education. Penn Plaza New York. Dostupné z http://www.mheresearch.com/assets/products/9b04d152845ec0a3/McGraw_Hill_Science_ReportFINAL1.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511-532. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Meador, G. (1988). Relating the Nature of Science and the Central Purpose of American Education to the Learning Cycle. Dostupné z http://www.bps-ok.org/physics/papers/learned.pdf. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Milton, J. R. (1987). Induction before Hume. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38(1), 49-74. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
National Research Council (U.S.). (1993). National Science Education Standards: An Enhanced Sample. A Working Paper of National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press. Dostupné z http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/committee.html Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Park, D.-Y. (2006) . Curriculum Reform Movement in the US – Science Education. Paper Presented at the 1st Pacific Rim Conference on Education, Hokkaido University of Education, Hokkaido, Japan. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Pea, R. D., & Collins, A. (2008). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (3–12). New York: Teachers College Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Prince M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research based. Journal of Engineering Education 95(2), 123-138. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Frank, M. (1989). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. (1989). Psychologist. 32(5). Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Project 2061. (1985). Dostupné z http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/default.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Rocard., M. a kol.(2007). Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Luxembourg. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Schwab, J. J. (2007). Guide to the Joseph J. Schwab papers 1939–1986. Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library. Dostupné z http://ead. lib. uchicago. edu/learn_on3. php. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Stine, D. D. (2010). US Civilian Space Policy Priorities: Reflections 50 Years After Sputnik. DIANE Publishing. Dostupné z http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RL34263 February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., Tsai, C. C., & Cheng, S. F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 541-566. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
University of Chicago Library. (2007). Guide to the Joseph J. Schwab Papers 1939-1986. Dostupné z WWW: http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.SCHWABJJ Vyhledej v Google Scholar
Wang, H. A., & Marsh, D. D. (2002). Science instruction with a humanistic twist: teachers' perception and practice in using the history of science in their classrooms. Science & Education, 11(2), 169-189. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

Licence

Autoři, kteří publikují v tomto časopise, souhlasí s následujícími body:

Autoři si ponechávají copyright a garantují časopisu právo prvního publikování, přitom je práce zároveň licencována pod Creative Commons Attribution licencí, která umožňuje ostatním sdílet tuto práci s tím, že přiznají jejího autora a první publikování v tomto časopisu.
Autoři mohou vstupovat do dalších samostatných smluvních dohod pro neexkluzivní šíření práce ve verzi, ve které byla publikována v časopise (například publikovat ji v knize), avšak s tím, že přiznají její první publikování v tomto časopisu.
Autorům je dovoleno a doporučováno, aby zpřístupnili svou práci online (například na svých webových stránkách) před a v průběhu redakčního řízení jejich příspěvku, protože takový postup může vést k produktivním výměnám názorů a také dřívější a vyšší citovanosti publikované práce (Viz Efekt otevřeného přístupu).

[1] Abd”El”Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok”Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., ... & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[2] Afra, N. Ch., Osta, I., Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students Alternative Conceptions about Electricity and Effect of Inquiry-Based Teaching Strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103-132. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[3] Akgul, E.,M. (2006). Teaching science in an inquiry-based learning environment: What it means for pre-service elementary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1),71–81. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[4] Jardine, L., Silverthorne, M. (eds.). (2000). Bacon, Francis. The New Organon. New York: Cambridge University Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[5] Banchi, H., Bell, R. (2008). The Many Levels of Inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29 Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[6] Barrow, L.,H. (2006). A Brief History of Inquiry: From Dewey to Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[7] Blanpied, W. A., Atkinson, R. C. Social Scientists’ Contributions to Science Policy during the New Deal. Dostupné z http://rca.ucsd.edu/speeches/Social_Science_and_Science_Policy.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[8] Bybee, R.W. (1997). The Sputnik Era: Why Is This Educational Reform Different From All Other Reforms? A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/bybee1.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[9] Chiappetta, E., L. (1997). Inquiry-Based Science Strategies and techniques for encouraging inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, 64(7), 22-26. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[10] Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[11] DeBoer, G., E. (1997). What we have learned and where we are headed lessons from the Sputnik era. A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/deboer.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[12] DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[13] Dow, P. (1997). Sputnik revisited: Historical perspectives on science reform. A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/dow2.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[14] Gentry, J. W. (1990). What is experiential learning? In J. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaining and experiential learning (9-20). East Brunswick, CN: Nichols/GP Publishing. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[15] Haury, D.,L. (1993). Teaching Science through Inquiry. ERIC/CSMEE Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education Columbus OH. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[16] Held, Ľ. a kol. (2011). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania. Trnava: Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[17] Hovey, A., Hazelwood, C., Svedkauskaite, A (2005). Critical Issue: Science Education in the Era of No Child Left Behind—History, Benchmarks, and Standards. Dostupné z http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/sc600.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[18] Chambers, C. (2002). Multi-Curricular Inquiry-Based Learning. City College of the City University of New York: condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/.../carlchambers.researchpaper.doc Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[19] Kim, M., Chin, Ch. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ views on practical work with inquiry orientation in textbook-oriented science classrooms. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(1), 23-37. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[20] Learning Point Associates. (2005). Using Student Engagement to Improve Adolescent Literacy. NCREL Quick Key Action Guide, 4. Dostupné z http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/qkey4.pdf. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[21] Macmillan a McGraw-Hill, (2005). The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Science Education. Penn Plaza New York. Dostupné z http://www.mheresearch.com/assets/products/9b04d152845ec0a3/McGraw_Hill_Science_ReportFINAL1.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[22] McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511-532. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[23] Meador, G. (1988). Relating the Nature of Science and the Central Purpose of American Education to the Learning Cycle. Dostupné z http://www.bps-ok.org/physics/papers/learned.pdf. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[24] Milton, J. R. (1987). Induction before Hume. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38(1), 49-74. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[25] National Research Council (U.S.). (1993). National Science Education Standards: An Enhanced Sample. A Working Paper of National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[26] Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press. Dostupné z http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/committee.html Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[27] Park, D.-Y. (2006) . Curriculum Reform Movement in the US – Science Education. Paper Presented at the 1st Pacific Rim Conference on Education, Hokkaido University of Education, Hokkaido, Japan. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[28] Pea, R. D., & Collins, A. (2008). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (3–12). New York: Teachers College Press. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[29] Prince M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research based. Journal of Engineering Education 95(2), 123-138. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[30] Frank, M. (1989). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. (1989). Psychologist. 32(5). Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[31] Project 2061. (1985). Dostupné z http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/default.htm Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[32] Rocard., M. a kol.(2007). Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Luxembourg. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[33] Schwab, J. J. (2007). Guide to the Joseph J. Schwab papers 1939–1986. Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library. Dostupné z http://ead. lib. uchicago. edu/learn_on3. php. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[34] Stine, D. D. (2010). US Civilian Space Policy Priorities: Reflections 50 Years After Sputnik. DIANE Publishing. Dostupné z http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RL34263 February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[35] Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., Tsai, C. C., & Cheng, S. F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 541-566. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[36] University of Chicago Library. (2007). Guide to the Joseph J. Schwab Papers 1939-1986. Dostupné z WWW: http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.SCHWABJJ Vyhledej v Google Scholar

[37] Wang, H. A., & Marsh, D. D. (2002). Science instruction with a humanistic twist: teachers' perception and practice in using the history of science in their classrooms. Science & Education, 11(2), 169-189. Vyhledej v Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

História induktívneho prístupu v prírodovednom vzdelávaní v USA a jeho súčasná reflexia na Slovensku

Jak citovat

Abstrakt

Reference

Stažení

Licence

Nejčtenější články stejného autora (stejných autorů)