Abstract
In this review study, we present the most common misconceptions about atoms that have been identified in foreign research. The frequency of these misconceptions is exemplified by a study we carried out in the Czech Republic, involving a set of 170 pupils consisting of one class of fourth graders at an eight-year grammar school and six classes of ninth graders from various basic schools, all of whom were quizzed on their understanding of atoms. At the same time, we show how some of their misconceptions parallel those of
ancient thinkers, focusing in particular on Greek atomists. By shedding light on their thought processes, we also want to show how the knowledge of the formation of historical pre-scientific theories is important for understanding how contemporary science works and what paradigm it is based on.
References
- Allen, M. (2014). Misconceptions in primary science. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Search in Google Scholar
- Aristotelés (1984). Člověk a příroda. Praha: Svoboda. Search in Google Scholar
- Aristotelés (1996). Fyzika. Praha: Petr Rezek. Search in Google Scholar
- Ayas, A., Özmen, H. & C¸ alik, M. (2010). Students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 165–184. Search in Google Scholar
- de Vos, W. & Verdonk, A.H. (1996). The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 657–664. Search in Google Scholar
- Diogenes Laertios (1964). Životy, názory a výroky proslulých filosofů. Praha: NČSAV. Search in Google Scholar
- Driver, R. et al. (2003). Making sense of secondary science. New York: Routledge Falmer. Feynmann, R.P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. (2000). Přednášky z fyziky s řešenými příklady 1. Praha: Fragment. Search in Google Scholar
- Griffiths, A.K. & Preston, K.P. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628. Search in Google Scholar
- Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534. Search in Google Scholar
- Holding, B. (1987). Investigation of schoolchildren’s understanding of the process of dissolving with special reference to the Conservation of matter and the development of atomistic ideas [Thesis]. Leeds: University of Leeds. Search in Google Scholar
- Chalmers, A. (2009). The scientist’s atom and the philosopher’s stone: How science succeeded and philosophy failed to gain knowledge of atoms. Dordrecht: Springer. Search in Google Scholar
- Karata¸s, F., Ünal, S., Durland, G. & Bodner, G. (2013). What do we know about students’ beliefs? Changes in students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter from pre-instruction to college. In G. Tsapralis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (231–248). Dordrecht: Springer. Search in Google Scholar
- Kirk, G. S., Raven, J.E. & Schofield, M. (2004). Předsókratovští filosofové. Praha: Oikoymenh. Search in Google Scholar
- Lacina, A. (2011). Částicová struktura látek ab initio I. Matematika, fyzika, informatika, 20(6), 350–355. Search in Google Scholar
- Liu, X. & Lesniak, K. (2005). Understanding the matter concept from elementary to high school. Science Education, 89(3), 433–450. Search in Google Scholar
- Lucretius Carus, T. (1971). O přírodě. Praha: Svoboda. Search in Google Scholar
- Mandíková, D. & Trna, J. (2011). Žákovské prekoncepce ve výuce fyziky. Paido: Brno. Search in Google Scholar
- Maunová, K. (2010). Žákovské představy a pojetí učiva [Rigorózní práce]. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita. Search in Google Scholar
- Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross-age study. Science Education, 65(2), 187–196. Search in Google Scholar
- Ozmen, H. (2011). Turkish primary students’ conceptions about the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(1), 99–121. Search in Google Scholar
- Palečková, J., Tomášek, V. & Straková, J. (1997). Třetí mezinárodní výzkum matematického a přírodovědného vzdělávání (Výsledky žáků 7. a 8. ročníků – Přírodovědné předměty). Praha: ÚIV. Search in Google Scholar
- Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání (RVP ZV). (2010). Česká republika. Dostupné z http://www.nuv.cz/file/133 Search in Google Scholar
- Renström, L., Anderson, B. & Marton, F. (1990). Students conceptions of matter. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 555–569. Search in Google Scholar
- Stepans, J. (2003). Targeting students’ science miskonceptions. Tampa: Showboard. Search in Google Scholar
- Svoboda, K. (Ed.). (1962). Zlomky předsokratovských myslitelů. Praha: NČSAV. Search in Google Scholar
- Škoda, J. & Doulík, P. (2006). Výzkum dětských pojetí vybraných přírodovědných fenoménů z učiva fyziky a chemie na základní škole. Pedagogika, 56(3), 231–245. Search in Google Scholar
- Štoll, I. (2009). Dějiny fyziky. Praha: Prometheus. Search in Google Scholar
- Tretera, I. (1996). Nástin dějin evropského myšlení. Praha: COWI. Search in Google Scholar
- Unver, A.O. & Arabacioglu, S. (2015). Helping pre-service science teachers to understand atomism through observations and experiments. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 64–84. Search in Google Scholar
Author Biography
Technická univerzita v Liberci, Fakulta přírodovědně-humanitní a pedagogická
Katedra filozofie
Downloads
4
- COMPARING PRE-SERVICE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ AND LOWER-SECONDARY LEARNERS’ UNDERSTANDING THE PARTICULATE NATURE OF MATTERhttps://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.558
- Miskoncepce z pedologie u studentů učitelství přírodních věd https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.665
- MOBILNÍ APLIKACE JAKO PROSTŘEDEK PODPORY VÝUKY O STAVBĚ ATOMU https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2022.2.1
- Miskoncepce týkající se animismu aneb je atom živý?https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2020.3.3
3