Reassessing the Role of the Communist Party in a Socialist Society: The Case of 1960s Czechoslovakia

Authors

  • Jan Šíma
  • Kristina Broučková

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/24645370.5151

Keywords:

Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, 1960s, social stratification, discourse, hegemony

Abstract

This article examines the efforts of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (CPCz) to discursively anchor its leading role amid the shifting socio-political terrain of the 1960s. While the party’s position was clearly defined during the revolutionary stage, the guidelines for exercising its leadership in the socialist society officially declared in 1960 were far less clear. This article focuses on how, over the following years, political discourse increasingly incorporated sociological findings about the structure of socialist society, influencing conceptions of the party’s leading role. Yet, once 1968 hit, as the people’s demands grew in response to the often-unsatisfactory lived experience in socialist society, the CPCz faced not only the challenge of defining its role but also the necessity of defending it to counteract public discontent. This article thus examines the rhetorical strategies employed by the political elite in the early months of 1968 to navigate this challenge. It argues that two rhetorical figures dominated the discourse: the recurrent term “unity” and the emerging term “trust.” These terms allowed the political elite to strike a precarious balance between maintaining continuity and striving for a radical departure from the status quo through hegemonic strategy.

Author Biographies

Jan Šíma

Jan Šíma is a PhD candidate at the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Arts, Charles University.

Kristina Broučková

Kristina Broučková is a PhD candidate at the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Arts, Charles University.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Šíma, Jan, and Kristina Broučková. 2025. “Reassessing the Role of the Communist Party in a Socialist Society: The Case of 1960s Czechoslovakia”. Dějiny – Teorie – Kritika, no. 2 (December):115–145. https://doi.org/10.14712/24645370.5151.

Issue

Section

Studies and Essays

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.