Science Literacy in the Pre-primary and Early Stages of Primary Education as a Tool for Increasing an Interest in Science and Technical Studies
PDF (Čeština)

How to Cite

Janoušková, S., Hubáčková, L., Pumpr, V., & Maršák, J. (2020). Science Literacy in the Pre-primary and Early Stages of Primary Education as a Tool for Increasing an Interest in Science and Technical Studies. Scientia in Educatione, 5(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.67

Abstract

Science literacy – especially on the low- and upper- secondary education level – has been in the focus of educational professionals and scholars for a long time. In the last decade the number of studies dealing with the pre-primary and early primary science education increased. These studies explore the linkage between science education and the development of positive attitudes towards science education by children, and argue that if the attitudes are formed already in early childhood, they may have a significant influence on the child’s future – personal and professional – development. Based on the in-depth review of scientific literature the authors of this paper aim at providing the information about the key aspects considered necessary for the child’s science knowledge, skills, attitudes and values’ development. These aspects lay a foundation for the development of the Structure of the Science Literacy in Pre-Schools and Early Primary Schools. The Structure follows/complements the already existing Structure of the Science Literacy for the Lower Secondary Education Level in the Czech Republic. We hope the paper will contribute to
the ongoing discussion about the prospects to increase an interest in science study as well as positive attitudes towards science education.
https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.67
PDF (Čeština)

References

Arons, A. B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2), 91–122.

Bennett, J. (2001). The development and use of an instrument to assess students’ attitude to the study of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 833–845.

Bruce, B. C., Bruce, S. P., Conrad, R. L. & Huang, H. J. (1997). University Science Students as Curriculum Planners, Teachers, and Role Models in Elemetary School Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 69–88.

Burghardt, G. & Gordon, M. (2011). Defining and Recognizing Play. In Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Play. (9–18) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dillon, J. (2009). On Scientific Literacy and Curriculum Reform. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, 4(3), 201–213.

Doulík, P., Škoda, J. & Hajerová-Mullerova, L. (2005). Shrnutí hlavních výsledků studie dětských pojetí. In Doulík, P. (Ed.) Geneze dětských pojetí vybraných fenoménů. Acta Universitatis Purkynianae 107. Studia paedagogica. Ústí nad Labem: UJEP.

Driver, R. & Bell, B. (1986) Students’ thinking about the and the learning of science. School Science Review, 67, 443–456.

European Commision (EC) (2007). Science Education NOW: A Renewd Pedagogy for the Future Europe. Belgie: European Communities.

Eshach, H. & Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 315–336.

Eshach, H. (2006). Science Literacy in Primary Schools and Pre-schools. Springer.

Faltýn, J., Němčíková, K. & Zelendová, E. (Eds.). (2011). Gramotnosti ve vzdělávání: příručka pro učitele. Praha: VÚP v Praze.

Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners’ knowledge in optics: Interpratation, structure and analysis. Internationa Journal of Science Education, 22, 57–88.

Gogolin, L. & Swartz, F. (1992). A quantitative and qualitative inquiry into the attitudes toward science of nonscience college majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 487–504.

Hubáčková, L., Janoušková, S. & Maršák, J. (2013). Přírodovědná gramotnost v předškolním vzdělávání. Dostupné z http://www.lach-ner.com/Files/file/Preprim p%C5%99%C3%ADr gr final.pdf.

Hubáčková, L., Janoušková, S. & Pumpr, V. (2013). Tajemství přírody: Objevné cesty vlastního poznávání. Řízení školy: speciál pro MŠ, 3, 8–10.

Christie, J. & Roskos, K. (2006). Standards, Science, and the Role of Play in Early Literacy Education. In Singer, D. (Ed.) Play=Learning: How Play Motivates and Enhances Children’s Cognitive and Social-Emotional Growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Janoušková, S., Maršák, J. & Pumpr, V. (2012). Přírodovědná gramotnost v primárním vzdělávání. Dostupné z http://www.lachner.com/Files/file/P%C5%99%C3%ADrod gramot prim%C3%A1rn%C3%AD final.pdf.

Jovanovic, J. & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477–496.

Kjærnsli, M. & Lie, S. (2011). Students’ Preference for Science Careers: International comparisons based on PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 121–144.

Kudrna, T., Hubáčková, L., Beneš, P. & Pumpr, V. (2013). Tajemství přírody: Objevné cesty vlastního poznávání. Řízení školy, 5, 27–28.

Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: conceptual overview. Science education, 84, 71–79.

Lightbody, P., Siann, G., Stocks, R. & Walsh, D. (1996). Motivation and attribution at secondary school: the role of gender. Educational Studies, 22, 13–25.

Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29–48.

Neumann, S. B. & Dickson, D. K. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Early Literacy Research (3). New York: The Guilford Press.

OECD (2008). Encouraging Student Interest in Science and Technology Studies. Paříž: OECD.

OECD (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paříž: OECD.

Osborne, R. & Wittrock, M. (2003). Learning Science: A generative process. Science Education, 77, 393–406.

Osborne, J. F. & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.

Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P. & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Motivation for Learning Science in Kindergarten: Is There a Gender Gap and Does Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Instruction Make a Difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 166–191.

Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific Literacy/Science Literacy. In Abell, S. K. & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Roskos, K. & Christie, J. (2007). The Play-Literacy Nexus and the Importance of Evidence-Based Techniques in the Classroom. American Journal of Play, 4(2), 204–224.

Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R. & Doherty, M. (1993). Reflecting on Scientific thinking: Chlidren’ sunderstanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. Child Development, 64, 1 617–1 636.

Simpson, R. D. & Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences of commitment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69, 19–24.

Sodian, B., Zatchik, D. & Carey, S. (1991). Young children’s differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753–766.

Weizman, Z. O. & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 265–279.

Wolpert, L. (1993). The Annual Nature of Science, London: Farber and Farber.