Revision of Analyses of Research on the Eff ect of Humour Used by Teachers on the Results of Pupils’ and Students’ Learning

Authors

  • Michaela Kubátová
  • Miroslav Klusák

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2020.1669

Keywords:

teacher’s humour, infl uence of humour on learning, relatedness of humour, humour techniques

Abstract

The review study continues the work of three relevant reviews of research on humour in the educational setting. The focus is only on research which studied the effect of teachers’ humour on the results of learning, and “results of learning” were operationalised by tests of acquired knowledge. The question is what circumstances influence the effect of humour. The analysis of 20 research studies rendered nine categories of circumstances problematising the effect of humour: the duration of instruction; the relatedness of humour to the subject matter; the dosage of humour; humour techniques; students’ perception of humorousness; students’ individual characteristics; the character of the subject matter; the medium of instruction, and the training of teachers. According to the research that was analysed, a positive effect is supported by: longer duration of the instruction; the relatedness of humour to substantial information; an appropriate and even dosage of humour; inserting humour after explaining new knowledge and repeating it after illustration with humorous examples; active work with humour during lessons; training of teachers in using humour, and students’ perception of humour as humorous. The problems of students’ individual characteristics, the character of the subject matter, and especially techniques of humorous punchline construction call for further research.

Author Biographies

Michaela Kubátová

Mgr. et Mgr. Michaela Kubátová,
Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta, katedra psychologie;
e-mail: michaela.pejchalova@pedf.cuni.cz

Miroslav Klusák

PhDr. Miroslav Klusák, CSc.,
Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta, katedra psychologie;
e-mail: miroslav.klusak@pedf.cuni.cz

References

Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115-144.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496867

Bingham, S. C., & Hernandez, A. A. (2009). "Laughing matters": The comedian as social observer, teacher, and conduit of the sociological perspective. Teaching Sociology, 37(4), 335-352.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0903700403

Bolkan, S., Griffin, D. J., & Goodboy, A. K. (2018). Humor in the classroom: the effects of integrated humor on student learning. Communication Education, 67(2), 144-164.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1413199

Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A. R., & Elliott, S. M. (1981). Effects of humorous illustrations in college textbooks. Human Communication Research, 8(1), 43-57.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00655.x

Carlson, K. A. (2011). The input of humor on memory: Is the humor effect about humor? Humor, 24 (1), 21-41.

https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2011.002

Davies, A. P., & Apter, M. J. (1980). Humour and its effect on learning in children. In P. E. McGhee & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Children's humour (s. 237-253). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Derks, P., Gardner, J. B., & Agarwal, R. (1998). Recall of innocent and tendentious humorous material. Humor, 11(1), 5-19.

https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1998.11.1.5

Gilliam, L. M. (2019). Magical management in the classroom: Using humor to speak their language. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40-53.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378702

Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to the immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39(1), 46-62.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378786

Gruner, C. R. (1967). Effect of humor on speaker ethos and audience information gain. Journal of Communication, 17(3), 228-233.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1967.tb01181.x

Gruner, C. R. (1970). The effect of humor in dull and interesting informative speeches. Central States Speech Journal, 21(3),160-166.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977009363017

Gruner, C. R. (1976). Wit and humor in mass communication. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (s. 287-311). London: John Wiley & Sons.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203789469-14

Hauck, W. E., & Thomas, J. W. (1972). The relationship of humor to intelligence, creativity, and intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 40(4), 52-55.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1972.11011352

Hays, E. R. (1970). Ego-threatening classroom communication: A factor analysis of student perceptions. Speech Teacher, 19(1), 43-48.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634527009377791

Houser, M. L., Cowan, R. L., & West, D. A. (2007). Investigating a new education frontier: Instructor communication behavior in CD-ROM texts - do traditionally positive behaviors translate into this new environment? Communication Quarterly, 55(1), 19-38.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370600998319

Kaplan, R. M., & Pascoe, G. C. (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(1), 61-65.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.1.61

Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37(3), 198-207.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378719

Klein, D. M., Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1982). Relationship between humor in introductory textbooks and students' evaluations of the texts' appeal and effectiveness. Psychological Reports, 50(1), 235-241.

https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.50.1.235

Mareš, J. (2013). Přehledové studie: jejich typologie, funkce a způsob vytváření. Pedagogická orientace, 23(4), 427-454.

https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-4-427

Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50030-7

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50024-1

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50025-3

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50022-8

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50023-X

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50021-6

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50027-7

https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2007.110

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50026-5

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50020-4

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50028-9

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50029-0

Matarazzo, K. L., Durik, A. M., & Delaney, M. L. (2010). The effect of humorous instructional materials on interest in a math task. Motivation & Emotion, 34(3), 293-305.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9178-5

Oppliger, P. A. (2003). Humor and learning. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. R. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (s. 255-273). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Powell, J., & Andersen, L. W. (1985). Humor and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 10(1), 79-90.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078512331378726

Rule, A. C. & Auge, J. (2005). Using humorous cartoons to teach mineral and rock concepts in sixth grade science class. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(5), 548-558.

https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.5.548

Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39(4), 341-353.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378814

Scott, T. M. (1976). Humor in Teaching. Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 47(8), 18.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00971170.1976.10612332

Shade, R. A. (1996). License to laugh: Humor in the classroom. Englewood, Colo.: Teacher Ideas Press.

Schmidt, S. R. (1994). Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20(4), 953-967.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.953

Schmidt, S. R. (2002). The humour effect: Differential processing and privileged retrieval. Memory, 10(2), 127-138.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000263

PMid:11798442

Schmidt, S. R., & Williams, A. R. (2001). Memory for humorous cartoons. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 305-311.

https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194924

PMid:11352213

Šeďová, K. (2012). Pedagogické efekty humoru ve výukové komunikaci. Pedagogika, 62(4), 426-441.

Šeďová, K. (2013). Humor ve škole. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

Teslow, J. L. (1995). Humor me: A call for research. Educational Technology Research & Development,43(3), 6-28.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300453

Torok, S. E., McMorris, R. F., & Lin, W. (2004). Is humor an appreciated teaching tool? Perceptions of professors' teaching styles and use of humor. College Teaching, 52(1), 14-20.

https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.52.1.14-20

Vance, C. M. (1987). A comparative study on the use of humor in the design of instruction. Instructional Science, 16, 79-100.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120007

Wakshlag, J. J., Day, K. D., & Zillmann, D. (1981). Selective exposure to educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 27-32.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.27

Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students' reports of learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 48-62.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379152

Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instruction humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238

Weaver, J., Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Effects of humorous distortions on children's

learning from educational television: Further evidence. Communication Education, 57(3), 181-187.

Zillmann, D., Williams, B. R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. R., & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 170-180.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.2.170

PMid:7365099

Zillmann, D., Masland, J. L., Weaver, J. B., Lacey, L. A., Jacobs, N. E., Dow, J. H., Klein, C. A., & Banker, S. R. (1984). Effects of humorous distortions on children's learning from educational television. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 802-812.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.802

Ziv, A. (1976). Facilitating effects of humor on creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 318-322.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.3.318

PMid:932306

Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 5-15.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1988.10806492

Published

2021-07-30

Issue

Section

Review paper